Answer: Northerners became strong opponents of the strengthened Fugitive Slave Act, which was part of the compromise.
Explanation:
The 1850 compromise is the bill that was approved by the United States Congress to lessen the conflict between the southerners (slavers) and the northerners (free states).
Among the agreements that were to be reached with the compromise are; the status that the lands obtained from Mexico should have, whether they should be free states or slave states. There was also a desire to negotiate the Fugitive Slave Act, which determined that slaves fleeing to the north must be returned to their owners, but the northerners refused to comply.
The agreement was intended to maintain the union between the states, however, no agreement was reached.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
A document-based essay shows how the theme under discussion relates to the time period of your attention. The purpose of writing it is for you to study the documents your professor gave you to learn and communicate an important idea about history. The writing is evidence founded so it tends to prove a point and for that you need facts and details (option A).
The answer is "True".
You see the position of your seat has actually nothing to do with the effectiveness of your head rest as you position the seat, the head rest will likewise move, influencing a person to change his or her level of comfort as he or she sits or rests.
- Corners and dark Areas
-Public Toilets
-Busy and Crowded Streets(Pick-pocketing, Molesting)
-Is shops(stealing)
-Isolated Areas(Not many People)
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
