The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
They had improved ship designs, navigation accuracy and cannons as well as joint stock companies
This best illustrates the impact of "dual processing".
<u>Explanation:</u>
A dual process hypothesis in psychology indicates an overview of how thinking can occur in two respective ways, or as a consequence of two different procedures. The two mechanisms also comprise of an implicit (automatic), unconscious process and an overt, conscious method.
Dual process frameworks are quite popular throughout the analysis of psychological social variables, like shift in attitude. An instance from the text will be the dual processing of sight which consists of a visual track of perception and a visual pursuit of action.
Answer:
just serch up the book and there should be an audio wedsite
Explanation:
The answer is "this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting".
IBR is a kind of board that applies research morals by looking into the techniques proposed for research to guarantee that they are moral and ethical and do not cross any limits proposed.
