1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
3 years ago
6

Erik is an investor with $5,000 available for investment. He has the following three investment possibilities from which to choo

se: Option Scenarios 1 Keep the $5,000 in cash for one year. 2 Invest in a friend’s business with a 50% chance of getting $10,000 after one year and a 50% chance of getting nothing. 3 Invest in a relative’s business with a 30% chance of getting $15,000 after one year, 20% chance of getting $2,500 after one year, 50% chance of getting nothing. If Erik is indifferent about these three investment options, and he thinks that they are worth the same to him. Therefore, which of the following statements is true about Erik? He is risk-neutral. He is risk-averse. He is risk-loving. None of these descriptions is accurate. Later, while examining the same investment alternatives, Erik’s brother, Devin, clearly expressed a preference for option 1. Which of the following statements is true about Devin? He is risk-averse. He is risk-neutral. He is risk-loving. None of the above.
Business
1 answer:
Elanso [62]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: None of these descriptions is accurate for Erik as he does not care about the level of risk involved and is indifferent to all the investment options and their risks.

Devin is risk averse as he decides to choose the safest option which is keeping the money as cash for one year.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The cash coverage ratio is used to evaluate the:Liquidity of a firmSpeed at which a firm generates cashLength of time that a fir
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": Ability of a firm to pay the interest on its debt.

Explanation:

The cash coverage ratio is a metric that measures a company's ability to pay its financial obligations. Generally, the higher the coverage ratio the better for the business to meet its debt obligations. It is best to compare coverage ratios of companies in the same industry or sector in the economy. Comparisons across industries are not useful as companies in different industries use debt in different ways.

5 0
3 years ago
A seller received a rental payment of $100 in advance. At closing, the seller has "earned" only $32 of this rent. What should ap
allsm [11]

Answer:

$68 appears as the amount unearned but received (or still paid in advance) in the closing statement

Explanation:

Amount received in advance = $100

Amount earned = $32

Amount (in advance at closing) is the difference between the amount originally paid in advance and the amount earned

Amount (in advance at closing) = $100 - $32

                                                    = $68

The amount that will appear in the closing statement as rental payment still in advance is $68.

3 0
3 years ago
Given that they often competen t powerful companies, it is imperative that entrepreneurs:
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Use strong judicial tools as patents and copyrights. Be flexible to enter the market. Understand that is more expensive to acquire a new client that to maintainn and excisting one.

Explanation:

The powerfull companies can make a product or service look bad (sabotage) or can change its prices to eliminate possible competitors from the market, they also have a huge share of the market so there are not many avilable new clients to gain.

3 0
3 years ago
Who do i write the check to for speeding ticket?
uysha [10]
The court which you were sentenced to go to. thats where i wrote mine to
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Stock splits:
iren [92.7K]

Answer: a. Allow management to conserve cash, give stockholders more shares, and cause no change in total assets, liabilities, or stockholders' equity.

Explanation:

Stock Splits increase the number of shares a company without actually changing their market capitalization by simply dividing the shares available.

There are a bunch of reasons to do this but one of them is to conserve cash. By splitting stock, managers can conserve cash by not paying dividends but still proving that the company can still pay dividends. The Shareholders getting MORE stock would be the reward.

Since Stock splits don't change the Market Capitalization, they don't have an effect on Equity either and by extension Assets and Liabilities.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2017 2018
    14·1 answer
  • The following information is available for Blossom Company for the year ended December 31, 2020. Beginning cash balance $ 47,610
    14·1 answer
  • Allison just received her semiannual payment of $35 on a bond she owns. which term refers to this payment?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following would you add to the balance per general ledger to arrive at the reconciled cash balance in a bank reconc
    11·1 answer
  • Tanek Corp.'s sales slumped badly in 2017. For the first time in its history, it operated at a loss. The company's income statem
    10·1 answer
  • Sunland Company is about to issue $262,700 of 6-year bonds paying an 9% interest rate, with interest payable semiannually. The d
    8·1 answer
  • What is the Disadvantage of fair trade?
    7·2 answers
  • What tax event must take place when a taxpayer receives a Form 1099-A?
    12·1 answer
  • • The Vice President of Customer Service has expressed concern over a project in which you are involved. His specific concern is
    11·1 answer
  • The united states helped mexico’s economy during world war ii by ordering raw materials and offering workers jobs. buying the ri
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!