Answer:
Luney Corporation is authorized to sell 100000 shares
luney has issued = 70000 shares
luney has shares outstanding 63000
Explanation:
given data
maximum shares of common stock = 100,000
sold shares = 70,000
reacquired = 7,000
solution
we know here 100000 shares are mention in charter of the company
so Luney Corporation is authorized to sell 100000 shares
and luney has issued = 70000 shares
so here
we know that
luney has shares outstanding = 70000 - 7000
luney has shares outstanding 63000
If Inez is not satisfied with the painting by Josh, Inez does not have to accept the portrait or pay Josh any money. Inez does not have to pay Josh at all.
Answer:
$21,767.50
Explanation:
<u>Computation table:</u>
<u>Particular Amount</u>
Sales $50,000
Less: Costs $23,000
<u>Less: Depreciation $2,250</u>
<u>EBIT $24,750</u>
<u>Less: Interest $2,000.
</u>
<u>EBT $22,750</u>
<u>Less: Tax (23%) $5,232.50
</u>
<u>Net Income $17,517.50</u>
$24,750 + 2,250 -5,232.50
$21,767.50
Answer:
1. This is true.
The Germans will pay a higher price for tuna because the tariff will increase the price of imported tuna and the reduction in completion with the local producers will lead to higher prices as the local producers take up their price.
2. This is true.
German producers no longer have to compete as much with imported tuna which was cheaper. They will therefore be able to raise their prices.
3. This statement is false.
The world price of Tuna DOES NOT increase because the tariff is only applicable in Germany. Other parts of the world will trade tuna as before. This is what is assumed.
4. This statement is true.
If Vietnam was exporting tuna to Germany, they will become worse off because they will see a decline in demand for their tuna on account of the tariffs making the tuna more expensive.
5. This is false.
Vietnamese tuna consumers will still pay the same price to get tuna because Vietnam produces the tuna. It is Vietnam's producers that will suffer not the consumers.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Richard De George is known for his work in business ethics. He discussed the conditions to permit whistle-blowing.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is permitted as moral authority when these 3 conditions are met:
1) The harm that will be done by the product [or company action] to the public is severe and considerable.
2) The engineer has told their superiors about their concern
3) The engineer has not received a satisfactory answer from their supervisors and also from other superiors and he is left with no other alternatives.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is mandatory as moral duty when these 2 additional conditions are met:
4) The engineer must have documented evidence that would convince a reasonable observer that his or her view is correct
5) There must be strong evidence that making the information public will in fact prevent the threaten serious harm.
