A vice-president has a very level of responsibility as well as workload. Often, the people at higher levels have to take risky decisions, and that too in a shorter time. They supervise a large portion of a company.
A human resource person may have a high workload but they don't have to supervise such a significant portion of the company, and they are not responsible for improvising the company, year after year, but a VP is.
The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
Answer:
Over John, the California court has: <u>c. in personam jurisdiction.</u>
Explanation:
In personam jurisdiction means personal jurisdicion:this means the court’s has the authority to determine personal rights and liabilities of the parties before it. This means that the cort has the authority to detemine John's personl rights and also to charge him if necessary.
No one would be able to stop moving, and the ball wouldn't stop moving.
