Answer:
Antifederalists argued that in a state of nature people were entirely free. In society some rights were yielded for the common good. But, there were some rights so fundamental that to give them up would be contrary to the common good. These rights, which should always be retained by the people, needed to be explicitly stated in a bill of rights that would clearly define the limits of government. A bill of rights would serve as a fire bell for the people, enabling them to immediately know when their rights were threatened.
Additionally, some Antifederalists argued that the protections of a bill of rights was especially important under the Constitution, which was an original compact with the people. State bills of rights offered no protection from oppressive acts of the federal government because the Constitution, treaties and laws made in pursuance of the Constitution were declared to be the supreme law of the land. Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights.
Explanation: i hope this helps some
Answer:
Pemba
Explanation:
I got this answer searching for each answer choice and when I search pemba the same photo that u have its a pemba and when I search the other answer choices they were different things.
Hope this helps:)
Pls mark brainlist
Answer:Ulysses S. Grant
Explanation:
Ulysses S. Grant was an American soldier and politician who served as the commanding general during the American Civil War which got him elected as the 18th president of the United States from 1869 to 1877.
False, they are less expensive
Answer:
The Answer Is (B)
Explanation:
Don't Need One These People Have Brains
