The book Sweet by Yotan Ottolenghi and Helen Goh is a dessert recipe book with the aim of recovering the tradition of cooking, as a ritual where friends are received and to show love to people, according to the authors.
The authors try to rescue the essence of cooking as a positive way to integrate people, even more so by proposing sweet recipes, whose main ingredient sugar has been considered harmful to health and the cause of obesity.
<h3 /><h3>Gastronomy as a cultural factor</h3>
Food, cuisine and its techniques are one of the forms of cultural identification as they reflect the customs of a people, influenced by their history, politics and religion, for example.
So, through the story of Melbourne's newcomer Helen Goh, and her gentle lament that there were no cookies at chef Ottolenghi's Desequius cafe, she began baking Australian cookies that were a bestseller.
Because of these facts, the two collaborated together to write the Sweet cookbook, which seeks to rescue the tradition of cooking as a cultural and social issue.
Find out more information about cuisine here:
brainly.com/question/17102309
Answer:
The opposite effects of wide correspondences on society can lead people towards destitution, bad behavior, exposed state, severity, horrendous mental and genuine prosperity issues and others as such genuine outcomes. For example, crowd hitting faultless individuals by moving redirected from the stories spread on the web has been typical.
Explanation:
I have no idea if you meant the definition. Hope this helps! Have a good rest of your day/night!
Hey there,
The following question's are the questions that I will answer.
When trying to distinguish between fiction and nonfiction, does the line between genres become blurred? Or, are there clear differences between these genres—like comparing apples to oranges? List and discuss the traits that you see in fiction and nonfiction works. Provide examples of each. Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction. What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres? Ultimately, would you rather read fiction or nonfiction?
Question #1
When trying to distinguish between fiction and nonfiction, does the line between genres become blurred?
Often, yes. Fiction and (non)-fiction can be very blurred when comparing. You have one genre that can totally be in a real case, and then you have (alot) of times where as fiction (itself) is just very (non) real. Like for example, "The Flintstones." That is fiction. We are not going to real live like them. They scrape there feet when they drive, (like who does that).
Question #2
Or, are there clear differences between these genres—like comparing apples to oranges?
Yes, not exactly all the time (fiction) & (non-fiction) is like this, but, the majority of the time,(fiction) & (non-fiction) can be like (apple & oranges)
Question #3
List and discuss the traits that you see in fiction and nonfiction works. Provide examples of each. Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction. What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres?
(Trait's that I see in fiction and nonfiction works. )
Some trait's that I see are that fiction works deal with alot of e.g: magic, human flying, and things that are not really real and things that can not be applied in real life. Now for the nonfiction work, this stuff would be real. I can apply movies like "paper town's) or "fault in our stars" and things like that. But things like "Batman (vs) Superman" and "Cars 3" and things like that are not real.
(Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction.)
I dont really like fiction. I love real life things. Things that can really happen in real life. I love that vibe. but also, I do like things like "spider-man" and things like that because they are cool. But I like more fiction things better. (opinion)
(What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres?)
Some things or (examples) that I know the align with both genre's would be things like "the way people feel" like you can tell in both genre's how the character feels. The things that are also things that line together would be things like (conflicts) and things like (exposition's) and (climax). They all either have (cliff hangers) and things that get a person excited. They also contain things like "love" and things like "romantic" and they also show different (POV). So those are some things that would have aligned together.
Question #4 (last question)
(Ultimately, would you rather read fiction or nonfiction?)
I would rather read (fiction). I like the real feel of when a story is true and not just a little fake things.
_____________________________________________________________
I really hope this helps you. I tried my hardest on this and I also hope this helps future people in (advance).
~Jurgen
Answer:
<em>If it’s research, then you are trying to do something that’s never been done before. There’s no guarantee that your approach will succeed. There’s no guarantee that any currently possible approach can succeed.</em>
<em>If it’s research, then you are trying to do something that’s never been done before. There’s no guarantee that your approach will succeed. There’s no guarantee that any currently possible approach can succeed.“Never been done before” and “No guarantee of success” makes all research expensive. The chances of success increase if you employ more people, buy or invent new equipment, and spend more time.</em>
Explanation:
<em>hope</em><em> it</em><em> will</em><em> help</em><em> you</em><em> have</em><em> a</em><em> great</em><em> day</em><em> bye</em><em> and</em><em> Mark</em><em> brainlist</em><em> if</em><em> the</em><em> answer</em><em> is</em><em> correct</em><em> </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>#</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>on </em><em>learning</em>