Answer:
1. b. Animals that develop with the same pattern share a common ancestor
2. a. The existence of significant difference between fossils of living things from different points in time
b. The similarities in the body structure, between living organisms of a given category, at the early stages of development, and the different application of the body structures as they grow
Explanation:
1. The concepts given in the paragraph are;
i) Studies in fossil observation, indicates that a difference exist in the fossils of living organisms at different historical times
ii) The similarities observed in form of existence of animals of a particular type at a given stage is an indication of common ancestry
iii) The arrangement of body parts of animals having different body structure, indicates that the animals have a common ancestries
The true statement is therefore;
b. Animals that develop with the same pattern share a common ancestor
2. The evidence that supports the theory of evolution are;
a. The existence of significant difference between the past and present living organisms is observable by the study of fossils
b. The similarities of the early stages of animals with backbone and the differences in the functions of the bones while still being in the same order of arrangement.
The Safavid Empire was a dynasty that once ruled Iran. They believed that Ali is the successor prophet of Muhammad being a cousin and also said to be called by God. <span>Shāh Ismāil I was the founder of Safavid Empire and through his efforts, he was able to make Shia Islam a state religion.
Mughal Empire arose in parts of India and Pakistan. They believed that next to Prophet Muhammad was Abu Akbar who was the third Emperor of Mughal Empire. However, but Safavid and Mughal </span>
This is because after winning independent slave trade also was in that event, or because Europeans wanted to influence Christians into Africa.
I'm guessing you are talking about the Eastern Roman Empire, or the Byzantine Empire.
the Byzantine Empire a) remained strong for several centuries, until it fail to the Ottoman Turks at ~1346 ad
hope this helps
Answer:
The relationship between Massasoit and New England colonists
Explanation:
So thinking about the one that doesn't have any association with trickery and war, you automatically can rule out the walking purchase, because the native Americans and English colonies were going up against each other for land. Then you have the Pequots and Connecticut colonists, if you remember, they do have not have good relations with each other and have had a war before, so that leaves you with the last option which is
The relationship between Massasoit and New England colonists.
Hope this will help :)
