Answer:
determine cash investing and financing transactions made during the period.
Explanation:
When you analyze the statement of cash flows, you can determine and predict how will operating cash flows be in the future. E.g. a project is generating high amounts of cash, so you can predict that it will continue to do so for some time. But what you cannot predict or even compare is related to the financial and investing transactions that the company will make in the future. E.g. by analyzing a cash flow you cannot know if the company will decide to invest in other projects or will it decide to issue more stocks.
Answer:
The multiple choices are:
A.
$1,000,000.
B.
$2,790,800.
C.$3790, 800.
D.$4,000,000
The correct optio is C,$3790, 800.
Explanation:
The interest expense on the loan is usually the opening balance multiplied by the market rate interest which is 10% in this question.
In addition,we can deduct the annual repayment in order to know the closing balance of the loan.
Year opening bal interest expense at10% repayment closing bal.
2019 $37,908,000 $3,790,800 $4,000,000
The closing balance is $37,908,000+ $3,790,800-$4000,000
The interest expense is 10% of the present value of $37.908,000 that is $ 3,790,800.00
Answer:
Explanation:
It means that there must be a huge number of people that have little or nothing.
The most recent estimate of America's population is 331,000,000 roughly
1% of the population is 331,000,000 * 1/100 = 3,310,000
So that means that 3 million people own 33% of 14 trillion in property alone. These numbers are really hard to imagine.
1 trillion has 12 zeros behind it
so 14 trillion has 12 zeros behind it.
3 million people own 1,400.000,000 = 14 000 000 000 000 dollars worth of property.
That means that each person in that group of 3 million is 1 of 14 , 000, 000 in wealth just in property alone. The goods will dilute this somewhat, but I think you get the idea.
3 million people in the United States are multimillionaires, if they own 100% of the property. Of course that isn't true, but I think it's fair to say that they are not poor either.
Ken, the agent, violated the law of agency
In this particular instance, when Ken told the the buyer that the seller would take a lower price than what was on the listing in order to close the sale faster and then told the buyer exactly which price they should offer, Ken, who is the agent, has now violated the law of agency
Answer:
c. loses some, but not all, of its customers as your answer loses some, but not all, of its customers
Explanation:
In a monopolistically competitive product is a product that has competition in the market, but that are not quite the same product, meaning they can´t be exactly replaced by a cheaper or different brand, when a company like that rises its prices, it eventually ends up loosing some clients, but not all, because of the loyal clients and those that can´t or won´t change brands, a good example of a monopolistically competitive firm, would be Apple, which has a loyal base of costumers that eventhough prices of apple products have been rising are still loyal, they are loosing some customers to other brands but not all of them.
