Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Notes: All working are part of answer and provided as an ‘Equation Column’
BOLDED portion is the part of required answer
Requirement 1: Budgeted Production in Sq. yards
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of the statement of stockholders' equity at the end of the year is presented below:
Apex Systems Co.
Statement of stockholders' equity
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Particulars Common Stock
Beginning
Balance $1,340,000
Add: Net income $356,000
Less:
Bart Nesbit, Drawing -$91,200
Ending balance $1,604,800
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
Job promotion and official recognition in form of an award are the motivational package I will give to the employee
Explanation:I
If an employee's performance after appraisal and due diligence is commendable because of its contribution to our organization goals, intrinsically, such person deserves to be promoted to a higher rank because his contributions are not premised on lip service and service seeking recognition.
On the contrary, when an employee's performance is premised on extrinsic factors after conducting necessary appraisal, such an employee simply does that because of the reward he or she seek, and not necessarily the passion attaches to the job. Hence, such employee can be given material compensation which can be monetized but not necessarily a job promotion.
