Answer:
(1) Solicitation and manslaughter
2) Could be charges as an accomplice and manslaughter
Explanation: the following are crimes Dan can be charged with
(A) Solicitation: the offense that consists of a person inducing another to commit a crime the specific intent that the person solicited commit the crime .Dan incited Ann in committing crime asking her help for getting cyanide which she refused initially but eventually agreed.
(B) Manslaughter Dan took the law into his hands by trying to kill the bandit and eventually killed another.
Ann got involved by agreeing to buy the cyanide which makes her a crime accomplice.
In defense, Dan could say it was an accident since there was no intent or his lawyer can make sure they prove that the prosecution does not have enough evidence
Yes Fredric Douglas's account is a trustworthy source for knowing about John Brown's intentions.
<h3>Who was Fredrick Douglas?</h3>
This man was an abolitionist, a speaker and a publisher in the United States.
He led the march to end slavery during the civil war in the country and before it.
His account is trustworthy due to the fact that he had personal relations with John Brown.
Read more on Fredrick Douglas here: brainly.com/question/13896424
