Answer: Pari delicto
Explanation:
The Pari delicto is a legal principle that means both parties are legally and equally responsible for making an illegal agreement or executing crime due to common interest. The term is common for the relief that is being denied to both parties under the civil proceedings because of equal responsibility of commission of wrongdoing by both parties. This legal principle ensures the equitable defense.
Answer: Genetic information of a person can only be used when the crime is unsolved violent crimes or the crime is a sexual offence. Other crimes where genetic information can be used is when the crime is a threat to the national security.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are certain guide lines that have been set by the department of Justice of the United States of America. For every case, genetic information can not be used. Even if the suspect is identified using the genetic information, the sample must be compared with the forensic profile directly. Suspect can not be solely arrested on the basis that he has been identified by the use of the genetic information.
The crimes for which the genetic information can be used is for the cases when there are unsolved violent cases or the sexual offences. There can be use of genetic information when there are crimes which are threat to national security.
Answer:
Bodily Injury Liability: $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident. Property Damage Liability: $25,000 per accident.
Explanation:
Liability insurance is mandatory in Georgia hope this helps :)
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.
And statements are usually made in court.
Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules
