1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phoenix [80]
3 years ago
12

Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these

two agreements(The United States—Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA) &The Dominican Republic-Central America FTA (CAFTA-DR) in bettering the US economy. Keep in mind that evaluating means discussing the pros and the cons, picking the side that seems stronger, and using facts to justify your choice.
Be sure to use topic sentences, transitions, conclusions, and introductions; proofread your editorial; and cite your sources.
History
1 answer:
NemiM [27]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the Mandate of Heaven?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:Under the Zhou Dynasty, China moved away from worship of Shangdi (“Celestial Lord”) in favor of worship of Tian (“heaven”), and they created the Mandate of Heaven. According to this idea, there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and this ruler reigned as the “Son of Heaven” with the approval of the gods. If a king ruled unfairly he could lose this approval, which would result in his downfall. Overthrow, natural disasters, and famine were taken as a sign that the ruler had lost the Mandate of Heaven.The Mandate of Heaven did not require a ruler to be of noble birth, and had no time limitations. Instead, rulers were expected to be good and just in order to keep the Mandate. The Zhou claimed that their rule was justified by the Mandate of Heaven. In other words, the Zhou believed that the Shang kings had become immoral with their excessive drinking, luxuriant living, and cruelty, and so had lost their mandate. The gods’ blessing was given instead to the new ruler under the Zhou Dynasty, which would rule China for the next 800 years.The need for the Zhou to create a history of a unified China is also why some scholars think the Xia Dynasty may have been an invention of the Zhou. The Zhou needed to erase the various small states of prehistoric China from history, and replace them with the monocratic Xia Dynasty in order for their Mandate of Heaven to seem valid (i.e., to support the claim that there always would be, and always had been, only one ruler of China).The Zhou ruled until 256 BCE, when the state of Qin captured Chengzhou. However, the Mandate of Heaven philosophy carried on throughout ancient China.

8 0
3 years ago
What were the nicknames for the soldiers in world war 1 from different countries?
Vesnalui [34]
BİLMİYORUM  SORRY BABY
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sentace about the constitutional cenvention
grin007 [14]
The Constitutional Convention was held for the reason to discuss possible improvements to the Articles of Confederation. It took place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787.
6 0
3 years ago
Question 1 of 10<br> 2 Points<br> Which of these statements is true based on the map?
Blababa [14]

Answer:

Um...

Explanation:

What map?

7 0
3 years ago
Read Abraham Lincoln’s statement below.
NNADVOKAT [17]
C because north and south fell apart because they couldn’t agree on slavery which led to the civil war
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • the declaration of independence was issued after the revolutionary war had already started what was the focus of debate about th
    10·1 answer
  • After richard nixon took office in 1969 what was his strategy in the vietnam war
    9·1 answer
  • What were the major costs of the us at the end of the Vietnam war
    15·1 answer
  • Which best explains how the structure of the executive office of the president helps fulfill Presidency’s office’s role?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the impetus for borglum's trips to washington<br> d.c., in the 1930's?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes Athenian society? A. All boys were taken from their homes at the age of seven and placed in
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF I CAN!! 20 POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the Platt Amendment?​
    11·1 answer
  • Why did early empires need a standing army
    14·1 answer
  • What was one major effect of the grand canal in china?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!