1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phoenix [80]
2 years ago
12

Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these

two agreements(The United States—Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA) &The Dominican Republic-Central America FTA (CAFTA-DR) in bettering the US economy. Keep in mind that evaluating means discussing the pros and the cons, picking the side that seems stronger, and using facts to justify your choice.
Be sure to use topic sentences, transitions, conclusions, and introductions; proofread your editorial; and cite your sources.
History
1 answer:
NemiM [27]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Identify 3 events that were part of the British strategy to capture Quebec in 1759
MrRa [10]
Because nfndidb djeodbdbd did die Chad f fjdididbd did d and d
5 0
3 years ago
The first 10 amendments to the constitution are commonly know as
stira [4]

They are more commonly known as the bill of rights.

8 0
3 years ago
What would happen if there were more free states?
viva [34]
There would be less slavery and the south would lose the civil war
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Abraham Lincoln win the presidency?. . A. Most Americans were abolitionists.. . B.The proslavery vote split between seve
zavuch27 [327]
Abraham Lincoln won the presidency in 1860 because the pro slavery vote was split between several candidates.  He ran against three others. They were Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas, Southern Democrat John C. Breckenridge and Constitutional Union candidate John Bell. Lincoln was the only Republican and the first to win a presidential election.
8 0
2 years ago
Help ekkk please and thank u is it true or false
Nuetrik [128]

The answer is True so click true

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Much of the South was divided into large farms called
    11·2 answers
  • Why is the president allowed to apppropriate government money in times of disasters?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the key aspects of Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society?
    9·1 answer
  • What group petitioned congress in 1794 to completely abolish slavery?
    12·1 answer
  • why did the Lincoln-Douglas debates resonate with the country...how did this impact lincoln's political future?
    12·1 answer
  • The major political party in Russia was the
    7·1 answer
  • How did the ten commandments compare to Hammurabi's code
    7·2 answers
  • What political figure was a leader of the radical Republicans in Congress ?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following events did NOT lead to Texas becoming its own province?
    5·1 answer
  • Sa ating pangkasalukuyang panahon, masasabi mo bang patuloy na nagaganap ang mga ideolohiyang Kolonyalismo at Imperyalismo? Ipal
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!