1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
2 years ago
7

Select the correct answer to each power that belongs to the states.

History
1 answer:
Vlad [161]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

regulate marriage

set speed limits

issue driver's licenses

create a marina

establish a public education system

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What role does the federal reserve play in regulating the banking system?
Anni [7]
The federal reserve coordinates all regulatory activities and examines banks periodically.
7 0
4 years ago
100 POINTS I NEED HELP!!!! Canada has a Constitutional Monarchy (lead by a King/Queen but they don’t really have any power) were
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

Toughie. Read this and maybe it'll help |

Explanation:                                            V

A constitutional monarchy is a form of monarchy in which the sovereign exercises authority in accordance with a written or unwritten constitution.[1] Constitutional monarchy differs from absolute monarchy (in which a monarch holds absolute power) in that constitutional monarchs are bound to exercise their powers and authorities within the limits prescribed within an established legal framework. Constitutional monarchies range from countries such as Monaco, Morocco, Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain, where the constitution grants substantial discretionary powers to the sovereign, to countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Belgium, Sweden and Japan, where the monarch retains no formal authorities.

Constitutional monarchy may refer to a system in which the monarch acts as a non-party political head of state under the constitution, whether written or unwritten.[2] While most monarchs may hold formal authority and the government may legally operate in the monarch's name, in the form typical in Europe the monarch no longer personally sets public policy or chooses political leaders. Political scientist Vernon Bogdanor, paraphrasing Thomas Macaulay, has defined a constitutional monarch as "A sovereign who reigns but does not rule".[3]

In addition to acting as a visible symbol of national unity, a constitutional monarch may hold formal powers such as dissolving parliament or giving royal assent to legislation. However, the exercise of such powers is largely strictly in accordance with either written constitutional principles or unwritten constitutional conventions, rather than any personal political preference imposed by the sovereign. In The English Constitution, British political theorist Walter Bagehot identified three main political rights which a constitutional monarch may freely exercise: the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, and the right to warn. Many constitutional monarchies still retain significant authorities or political influence however, such as through certain reserve powers, and may also play an important political role.

The United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms are all constitutional monarchies in the Westminster system of constitutional governance. Two constitutional monarchies – Malaysia and Cambodia – are elective monarchies, wherein the ruler is periodically selected by a small electoral college.

Strongly limited constitutional monarchies can be called crowned republics.

The concept of semi-constitutional monarchy identifies constitutional monarchies with less parliamentary powers.[4] Because of this, constitutional monarchies are also called 'parliamentary monarchies' to differentiate them from semi-constitutional monarchies.[5]

The oldest constitutional monarchy dating back to ancient times was that of the Hittites. They were an ancient Anatolian people that lived during the Bronze Age whose king or queen had to share their authority with an assembly, called the Panku, which was the equivalent to a modern-day deliberative assembly or a legislature. Members of the Panku came from scattered noble families who worked as representatives of their subjects in an adjutant or subaltern federal-type landscape.[6][7]

Constitutional and absolute monarchy

England, Scotland and the United Kingdom

In the Kingdom of England, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ("a limited monarchy") are much older than that (see Magna Carta). At the same time, in Scotland, the Convention of Estates enacted the Claim of Right Act 1689, which placed similar limits on the Scottish monarchy.

There are currently 43 monarchies worldwide.

8 0
3 years ago
How have modern ethnic and nationalist disputes caused conflict?
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

How have modern ethnic and nationalist disputes caused conflict?

--> Many ethnic conflicts are rooted in a specific kind of nationalism, in which the sense of belonging to a nation-state is defined purely by ethnicity. This makes ethnic minorities outsiders within the nation-state, and violence is often the result.

How has terrorism affected the world?

--> The breakdown of controls in the former Soviet empire has complemented the larger global trends by opening up even more operating areas for transnational terrorists, especially Middle Eastern extremists. The emergence of the conflict in Chechnya as a new jihad has accelerated this trend.

What were the major causes of genocide in the twentieth century?

--> One of the main causes was Nazi racial ideology. The Nazis thought Jews and Romas were 'racially inferior' to the German people. Millions of Jews were murdered under the Nazi regime, as well as tens of thousands of Romas. Because the genocides occurred during World War II, the Nazi regime was able to kill many people from many different countries, including Poland, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union, France, and Romania.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the United States respond to the sinking of the Lusitania? Select all that apply.
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:i think it's

2.The U.S. remained neutral.

4.President Wilson sent four angry protests to Germany about their inhumane behavior.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you provide information through writing that is:
Nitella [24]
This is called Informative writing
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pouvez me faire un reportage écris sur ronaldo
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the BEST example of insuring domestic tranquility?
    13·2 answers
  • resources spent for placing a computer, projector, and screen in every school classroom are a form of
    8·1 answer
  • What proposal did the populist party make to address the problems outlined in its platform?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the name of the first transatlantic passenger steamship?
    5·1 answer
  • What did Hitler call his program to deal with the Jewish problem<br> in Europe
    10·1 answer
  • After world war ii, ______ was a continued military influence on a number of islands in the pacific.
    15·2 answers
  • Is Lian Yu a real place?
    15·1 answer
  • 3. Explain how Aksum changed from Pagan religious<br> beliefs to Christianity.
    13·2 answers
  • 32) Which of these factors made the GREATEST contribution to the success of the Allies in World War II?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!