A. because sometimes (like on this case) you can tell which is correct. just say it out loudm would you say neither of them was___''
1) Communism because it’s a type of government that started the Vietnam war and other stuff. Also any war or anything related to war memes. Don’t forget Jew memes
2) Racial memes; every comment or saying in this generation can probably be taken as offense by now
I hope I was of help
Answer:
1). Which word best describes the tone of the second paragraph? - Offended.
2). Why does the writer mention "existing engagements" in the conclusion of this excerpt? - To clarify the intent of his assertion that the country should not create new attachments with other countries
3). Which stylistic device does the author use in paragraph three to illustrate the potential ills of foreign alliances? - Elevated diction
Explanation:
- 1. To describe the second paragraph, choose one word. - Offended. The controlling country's description accuses it of "misleading public opinion, influencing or aweing public councils."
- 2. "Existing engagements" is mentioned in the conclusion of this excerpt. - To clarify his statement that the country should not form new alliances with other countries
- 3. He states his intentions for the country's future policy and does not intend to extend "existing engagements". "But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and unwise to extend them."
(3.) In paragraph three, how does the author illustrate the dangers of foreign alliances? Aesthetics
This extract has the typical eloquent word use and complex sentence structure. Here are some examples: "to actuate" means to initiate; "to second" means to support.
Democracy cannot be at any place where a religious book is the constitution, genders are not equally treated, people of other religions are not allowed to practice their religion in public, there is no right to speech. Now you can decide yourself whether there can be democracy or not.
