Answer:
D. an external locus of control
Explanation:
In psychology, there are two distinct types of locus of control including the internal and the external locus of control.
External locus of control is described as a process through which an individual feels that his or her failures or successes occur as a consequence of some external factors or reasons which is beyond his or her control, for example, unfair teachers, circumstance, prejudiced, luck, injustice, bias, fate, etc.
An individual who is experiencing an external locus of control generally feels anxious as he or she believe of not having any control over his or her life.
In the question above, Helene's lack of perceptiveness best illustrates the dangers of an external locus of control.
Everyone experiences negative emotions. This statement is true.
<h3>What is emotion?</h3>
Emotion can be described as the feeling that a person is having that can be very on a large scale, are there a lot of feelings like anger, laugh, happiness, sadness, etc
Everyone's experiences are human emotions is it a true statement in everybody's life there are some changes with her happening with make them of a set and sometimes to the people also it can be caused due to hormonal changes.
Emotions that are considered negative, like sadness, jealousy, guilt, frustration, etc.
Learn more about emotion, here
brainly.com/question/14171081
#SPJ4
Kalends is the answer, in America, we have months, but they just called it Kalends..
i hope that this helps you. =)
Answer: <u><em>The given statement is false</em></u>, since "positivism" paradigm that presumes that nature can be studied and comprehended in a logical, scientific manner; stresses objectivity, exactness, and generalization.
Therefore, the following statement; "According to Babbie, one critical review of "positivism" in dismal science research is that individual may not be able to be as verifiable as the knowledge domain ideal presume." is false.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>the hindsight bias </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In social psychology, </em><em>the hindsight bias is determined as the proclivity of a person to 'overestimate' his or her capability of predicting a particular outcome that couldn't be possibly predicted. In-short, a person claim of knowing something or predicting something that is not actually possible. The hindsight bias is also referred to as 'creeping determinism' or 'knew-it-all-along phenomenon'. </em>
<em>As per the given question, the given statement demonstrates the hindsight bias.</em>
