1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
9

When he suggested that change should be brought about "by any means necessary," Malcolm X was

History
1 answer:
boyakko [2]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

He suggested that violence could be used to bring about the change.

The great difference between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King was that the first one advocated for violence as a valid mean to get his goals while Martin Luther King believed in peaceful means.

You might be interested in
What is sometimes considered the boundary between Africa and Asia?
MAXImum [283]
The correct answer is the Suez Canal in Egypt.

The others are in different continents: The Grand Canal in Europe (Venice), the Panama Canal in the Americas ( and splits the two Americas) and Erie Canal is in America (NY).
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A viking from norway who founded the first EUROPEAN settlement in Greenland
Anettt [7]

Erik the Red. Erik the Red, byname of Erik Thorvaldsson, Old Norse Eirik Rauð, Icelandic Eiríkur Rauði, (flourished 10th century, Norway?), founder of the first European settlement on Greenland (c. 985) and the father of Leif Eriksson, one of the first Europeans to reach North America.

Hope this helps. :)

8 0
3 years ago
What two Georgians signed the united states constitution
telo118 [61]
William Few and Abraham Baldwin
3 0
3 years ago
Byzantines believed that their emperor was a representative of God.
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

true they do believe so

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Details.<br> 1.<br> Discuss the criticisms of the name Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
KATRIN_1 [288]
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male is the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history, as noted by Arthur L. Caplan (1992). Begun in 1932 by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS), the study was purportedly designed to determine the natural course of untreated latent syphilis in some 400 African American men in Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama. The research subjects, all of whom had syphilis when they were enrolled in the study-contrary to the “urban myth” that holds “black men in Alabama were injected with the virus that causes syphilis” (Walker, 1992)-were matched against 200 uninfected subjects who served as a control group.

The subjects were recruited with misleading promises of “special free treatment,” which were actually spinal taps done without anesthesia to study the neurological effects of syphilis, and they were enrolled without their informed consent.

The subjects received heavy metals therapy, standard treatment in 1932, but were denied antibiotic therapy when it became clear in the 1940s that penicillin was a safe and effective treatment for the disease. When penicillin became widely available by the early 1950s as the preferred treatment for syphilis, this therapy was again withheld. On several occasions, the USPHS actually sought to prevent treatment.

The first published report of the study appeared in 1936, with subsequent papers issued every four to six years until the early 1970s. In l969, a committee at the federally operated Center for Disease Control decided the study should continue. Only in 1972, when accounts of the study first appeared in the national press, did the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) halt the experiment.

At that time, 74 of the test subjects were still alive; at least 28, but perhaps more than 100, had died directly from advanced syphilis. An investigatory panel appointed by HEW in August 1972 found the study “ethically unjustified” and argued that penicillin should have been provided to the men. As a result, the National Research Act, passed in 1974, mandated that all federally funded proposed research with human subjects be approved by an institutional review board (IRB). By 1992, final payments of approximately $40,000 were made to survivors under an agreement settling the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Tuskegee Study subjects. President Clinton publicly apologized on behalf of the federal government to the handful of study survivors in April 1997.

Several major ethical issues involving human research subjects need to be studied further. The first major ethical issue to be considered is informed consent, which refers to telling potential research participants about all aspects of the research that might reasonably influence their decision to participate. A major unresolved concern is exactly how far researchers’ obligations extend to research subjects. Another concern has to do with the possibility that a person might feel pressured to agree or might not understand precisely what he or she is agreeing to. The investigators took advantage of a deprived socioeconomic situation in which the participants had experienced low levels of care. The contacts were with doctors and nurses who were seen as authority figures.
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jackson and his classmates are studying environmental pollution. They research a factory near the school and find out that it pr
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how the Inca and Pizarro interacted with each other, and what happened as a result of their meeting
    15·1 answer
  • What were the two basic areas into which Carolina was divided?
    7·2 answers
  • After World War II, many countries belleved in the principle of collective security, which means that
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the migration of the Cherokee called the Trail of Tears?
    5·2 answers
  • The group of people empowered to make the laws were?
    5·2 answers
  • Which group of people had the most voter power with Georgia's county unit system?
    12·1 answer
  • What happened when the Incas and the Spanish met for the first time?
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Which of the following statements explains how Federalists and Democratic-Republicans
    10·1 answer
  • Help pls ASAP!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!