That answer is True because it says that the lowest possible quality and it is true
The way economists would probably explain the wastage of
this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore
subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect
is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster
Lloyd.
The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition
within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their
own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage
of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users.
In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
1 : D
2: A
3: B
4: C
5: C
6: A
7: C
8: C
Hope this helps u brainliest is appreciated
~lexy
Answer / Explanation:
Before answering this question, let us understand some terms used in the narrative:
Marginal Utility: Utility in itself can be refereed to as the satisfaction derived from the consumption of a particular good or service. However, when we now becomes a marginal utility, it mean we are now paying attention to the level of change in the extra level of satisfaction derived from the particular good and service.
Optimal Consumption: This can be referred to as one of the guiding principle of consumption in an economy, it stipulates that when a consumer maximizes utility or attain maximum satisfaction, the marginal utility per amount spent must be the equal all goods and services in the same class of goods..
In summary it is a state of mind or feeling that people get a certain level of joy utility from consuming goods and service while Marginal utility is the benefit of consuming an extra unit of that product.
Now referring back to the question and answering it,
If Connie is making optimal consumer choices, the ratio of marginal utility to the price should be the same for both goods. Hence, the price of coffee is 3/2 as much and these ratios are equal and the marginal utility of coffee must be = 3/2 as high as that of tea at the quantities she is purchasing them at.
