The information given about the proof does that Daniel made an error on line 2.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Given:
1. AB = 3x +2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38
2. AB + BC = AC incorrect (not an angle angle addition postulate)
3. 3x+2 + 4x + 8 = 38 correct
4. 7x + 10 = 38 correct
5. 7x = 28 correct
6. x = 4
Daniel made an error on line 2.
Here is the complete question:
Daniel wrote the following two-column proof for the given information. Given: AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 Prove: x = 4 Statements Reason 1. AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 1. Given 2. AB + BC = AC 2. Angle Addition Postulate 3. 3x + 2 + 4x + 8 = 38 3. Substitution Property of Equality 4. 7x + 10 = 38 4. Combining Like Terms 5. 7x = 28 5. Subtraction Property of Equality 6. x = 4 6. Division Property of Equality On which line, did Daniel make his error? line 2 line 3 line 4 line 5
Learn more about proof on:
brainly.com/question/4134755
#SPJ1
Since one side is 40°, you subtract that from 180.
180° - 40°= 140°.
So therefore your missing side lengths are 140, 40, and 140.
hopefully this helps
Everything has been explained in there
Complete Question
Table of Annual CPI values
2003-184.00
2004-188.90
2005-195.3
2006-201.6
2007-207.342
2008-215.303
2009-214.537
2010-218.056
2011-224.939
2012-229.594
2013-232.957
2014-236.736
QRINC offered new employees a starting salary of $34,862 in 2013. What would a comparable starting salary have been in 2003?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
CPI for 2003(index)=2003-184.00
CPI for 2013(index)=2013-232.957
Starting salary in 2013 at $34,862
Generally comparable starting salary C is given as
Therefore C the comparable starting salary is givrn to be
Answer:
the answer is 3 because 1x3=3
