The answer is letter b. children's failure to control their
behavior according to the expectations of parents, peers, teachers, and/or
legal authorities. Externalizing Disorders is a failure to control behavior in
accordance with the authority that leads to difficulties in child's external
world and Notice by teachers or parents. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: the blank must be the understanding perception
Explanation: go to chrome and searche the word perception.....
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
B. the mining and meat packing industries developed
Explanation:
With the expanding of the railroad lot of industries flourished, including the mining and the meat packing industries. The reason for that was that the railroads managed to connect all the major cities and the part of the country, also enabling for much quicker movement of the goods from one place to another. Since this became possible, the industries quickly developed as they were able to sell their products on much larger distances with this new method of transportation, soon becoming one of the major and most profitable industries.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is true.
Explanation:
The correct answer is true, because American culture is a mixture of different cultures that affected it throughout different periods of time. That is why immigrants affected and shaped American culture. America is created by immigrants and that is why the culture of this country and the whole continent is shaped by them.
Of course, this means that answer false is not correct at all.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as  brainlist