Answer:
- In the late 1700s, Indian farmers produced cotton that was shipped to British factories to produce textiles.
Explanation:
Amid the late 1700s, farmers in India delivered cotton and sent them to certain industrial facilities in the British nations to create materials. In this century, the development of India from exchanging and agrarian culture to an economy of administrations and assembling was the financial history of India. Be that as it may, India was as yet ready to get by on their farming.
The correct answer should be
<span>A. French settlers were on friendly terms with Native Americans and they relied on them to provide furs
They needed fur and leather for trading and they worked together with the natives since the natives were excellent hunters and knew the land. So they would give them things like weapons or clothes, and in return they'd get fur and things like that from them.</span>
Answer:
95% average accuracy. The 1830s and 1848 are called as the year of revolutions in Europe. French liberals and French radicals both aimed to kick Charles X off of the throne and rebuild the government. The Frankfurt Assembly revolution of 1848 was a complete failure.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is B. It is not true that the Plessy v. Ferguson case paved the way for the Little Rock 9 to attend Central High School.
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1896 that ruled on the constitutionality of the right of the states of the Union to impose racial segregation in public places under the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The court decided, by 7 votes to 1, to declare that segregation in the southern states did not violate the Constitution (in particular the 14th Amendment which stated that all citizens were equal before the law). Judge Henry Billings Brown, speaking for the majority that approved the decision, said that the segregation done in the state of Louisiana did not imply inferiority, in the eyes of the law, of African Americans and that the separation by race in public places and services was a mere political issue. The dissenting voice within the Court, Judge John Marshall Harlan, strongly condemned his colleagues and said that this decision would be as negatively striking as the "Dred Scott Case". He added that the law of the United States did not state that the country had a caste system, that the constitution did not see the color of its citizens' skin and that everyone was equal under the law. Several jurists agreed with Harlan and the nation was divided over it. The southern states, however, rejoiced that their system of segregation by race now had a legal basis to support itself.
