Answer:
the answer is the President

<u>No</u><u> </u><u>criminal</u><u> </u><u>crime</u><u> </u><u>should</u><u> </u><u>not</u><u> </u><u>be</u><u> </u><u>heard</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>other</u><u> </u><u>than</u><u> </u><u>professional</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>paid</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>because</u><u> </u><u>they</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>lot</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>experience</u><u> </u><u>about</u><u> </u><u>these</u><u> </u><u>kinds</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>cases</u>
Misdemanors ( less serious then a felony)
Answer:
Simple!! Profiling!
Explanation:
Tons say that felons are discriminated and profiled negatively based on their race, class, gender, AND appearance. If law enforcement were to see someone with tattoos, that person has a chance of being criminally profiled in a negative way. It's the same for if you see a southern, black, hispanic, or Arabic felon. Yes, I have to say, they are interrogated fairly, but I would say law enforcement is stereotypical of the people in which they arrest. You're welcome!