When did the supreme court put an end to segregation.

Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair.

BartSMP [9]

1) The theory of product liability under which Weasley could have sued Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries is strict product liability.

However, the facts do not support such a claim because the negligence of Weasley caused Ginny's injuries. How could a child of six years be left alone in a spa?

<h3>What are the theories of product liability?</h3>

The theories of product liability, which involve injury or damage caused by a defective product, include negligence, breach of contract/warranty, and strict liability.

For strict liability to be imposed on Great Lakes, Weasley must prove that the tort occurred based on Mundungus' irresponsibility. The question is, was Mundungus responsible for caring for Ginny or her mother?

2) The Privity of contract would not be required in a product liability case against Great Lakes. Since the spa is a product of Great Lakes while Mundungus sold it to Weasley, there is no basis for Great Lakes to deny privity of contract.

<h3>What is the privity of contract?</h3>

Using privity of contract as a basis of defense means that only parties to a contract have right to sue and be sued so that they can enforce the rights and obligations arising from the contract.

3) The six requirements that Weasley must meet for action in strict product liability against Great Lakes are proving that:

The spa caused Ginny to be injured and not Weasley's negligence.
The spa that injured Ginny was defective.
The defect of the spa caused Ginny's injury.
The defect of the spa made it dangerous for Ginny.
The negligence arose from Great Lakes.
Great Lakes breached the contract warranty.

4) The defenses to product liability that Mundungus or Great Lakes can assert are as follows:

Weasley lacks the locus standi.
No duty of care was owed to Ginny by Mundungus or Great Lakes.
Weasley misused the spa through her negligence.
Weasley must know the riskiness of abandoning Ginny in the spa.

Thus, none of the theories of product liability supports Weasley's case.

Learn more about the theories of product liability at brainly.com/question/17202560

4 0

2 years ago

Example of institutional model

nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

I believe the answer would be every society have mainly five Social institutions such as family,government,religion,education, economics.

574 views

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Describe the print patterns that would distinguish between the following:

konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

e a person Washington uh

5 0

3 years ago

Question 6

butalik [34]

Answer:

It was a part of the spoils system also known as political patronage. They would be called political patrons.

3 0

3 years ago

Chapter 1 covers various Schools of Legal Thought. 1) Pick two of the schools of thought and describe how each school of thought

Nat2105 [25]

Answer and Explanation:

Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.

Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.

2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.

7 0

3 years ago