1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
2 years ago
13

What was the drawback of the sherman anti trust act

History
1 answer:
Nana76 [90]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Failed to define critical terms

Explanation:

The Sherman Act was designed to restore competition but was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as “trust,” “combination,” “conspiracy,” and “monopoly.” Five years later, the Supreme Court dismantled the Sherman Act in United States v.

You might be interested in
What was the purpose of Stalin being able to control certain countries called Soviet Satellite countries?
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

c .As a way to have further distance and a barrier of safety between the communist east and capitalist west in Europe.

Explanation:

Stalin's main motive for the creation of Soviet satellite states in Eastern Europe was the need for security. When the war ended, the Soviet Union was the only Communist country in the world and Stalin believed that Western countries were bent on destroying it.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did Americans need to use the Mississippi River and New Orleans?
miskamm [114]

Answer: Because New Orleans was a very important trading port. ... The New Orleans was very important for importing and exporting goods;Mississippi River was a major transportation for settlers and good to ship items east.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Were the colonists justified in resorting to violence to achieve their goals?
marusya05 [52]

Answer: Yes the colonist were justified in the violence towards the British because of all of the hardships and violence the British committed against the colonist. From the Stamp Act to the Townshend Act, to the Boston massacre were all things that led up to the colonist being fed up with the tyrant British king so they revolted to break away from Britian's grip.

Explanation: Hope this helps ;)

5 0
2 years ago
45points!!
Anton [14]

Definitely the second choice! :)

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was vicksburg so important to the union?
Semenov [28]
The union victory at Vicksburg was important for the north because the Union army captured the last Confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, completing the Northern Strategy
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about Shays' Rebellion is false?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the expedition of 1584?
    12·1 answer
  • In 1997, the Kyoto Protocol treaty was signed by
    7·2 answers
  • What event triggered the seizure of the American hostages in Iran?
    14·1 answer
  • Which country signed a non-aggression pact with an Axis power at the start of the World War II but later sided with the Allies?
    12·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    15·1 answer
  • Describing Humidity
    13·2 answers
  • Explain why cities size increased during the gilded age
    8·1 answer
  • The event that happened because a French diplomat plotted to ignore Washington’s order of neutrality and equip ships to fight th
    13·2 answers
  • One of the impacts of the protests and increased violence in the late 1960s was that.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!