1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delicious77 [7]
2 years ago
9

1. Who do you think "won"

History
1 answer:
QveST [7]2 years ago
3 0

Regarding the clash of cultures between traditionalism (the old) and modernism (the new) there is no specific winner, but what happens is the transformation of society according to the new parameters that have been incorporated throughout history.

<h3>Examples of clash of cultures</h3>

Therefore, it is correct to say that the clash of cultures is still occurring today. As some examples for this fact, we can base ourselves on the technological revolution, which made globalization and the digital revolution possible.

With globalization, multicultural environments also emerged, where each culture is able to influence the other and coexist peacefully.

There is also the digitization of work, social interaction and the speed of information flow made possible by the creation of the internet, which makes older people need to adapt to these new realities in order to fit into new social dynamics.

Find out more information about globalization here:

brainly.com/question/1133228

You might be interested in
True Facts....!!!!<br>.<br>.<br>What is hemoglobin????? explain!!!!! ​
irinina [24]

Explanation:

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:(1X4=4)

In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup in October 1999. He

overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the ‘Chief

Executive’ of the country. Later he changed his designation to President and in

2002 held a referendum in the country that granted him a five-year extension.

Pakistani media, human rights organisations and democracy activists said that the

referendum was based on malpractices and fraud. In August 2002 he issued a

‘Legal Framework Order’ that amended the Constitution of Pakistan. According to

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Chinese require the Portuguese to pay for goods in gold and silver when trading?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is A) Portuguese goods were less valuable than Chinese goods

Explanation:

At the time, the Chinese civilization was one of the most advanced in the world. The products they made including silk, ornaments, porcelain etc had a lot of value in countries like Portugal who had a growing income.

However,  Portuguese products were not of very high quality. The Portuguese developed textiles, wooden products and even imported new agriculture products from South America. However, these products were not considered valuable in China.

Hence, Ming China wanted the Portuguese to pay in more valuable for Gold and Silver.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Leading up to the Civil War the South had an economy based on agriculture and slave labor while the North had an
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

Manufacturing

Explanation:

Before the Civil War, the South had an economy based on agriculture and slave labor. They focused on crops such as silk, cotton, food crops and cash crops and made a lot of money from them. They were also heavily involved in slave labour due to their heavy reliance on labor for their farmlands.

However the North was heavily reliant on manufacturing. This helped the North in the war as they manufactured weapons and other equipments for their use.

6 0
3 years ago
The Declaration of Independence was neither a declaration of war (war had already broken out) or a legal document, so why was it
Valentin [98]

Answer: The dec. of independence was a document stating that men from England wanted freedom to start a new country in America.

Explanation: Jefferson and the other men that signed it all came in terms. These people wanted out of England’s ways and rules. Starting a new country was ideal. Creating a document was the more formal way for the split however with war breaking out to gain the country back, the document was a threat to England leaders.

6 0
3 years ago
What might have happened had the Civil War not
Mademuasel [1]

Answer: A).The Confederacy would not have been formed

Explanation:

Without the emancipation proclamation made by Abraham Lincoln, The United States of America would not have broken out in the Civil War. Thus, the confederate army would not have been formed- though there still would have been people with the same mentality that they wanted to keep slavery in the country.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What impact did the Industrial Revolution have on:
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think Nixon's policy of détente was good or bad for the United States? Why or Why not? Do you think Reagan's strategic de
    6·1 answer
  • The plow a farmer uses to plant crops is an example of which factor of production?
    9·2 answers
  • ACHIEVEMENTS OF BABAR
    15·1 answer
  • What was a key element in developing a market economy in nineteenth century america
    12·1 answer
  • Like Roman,the United States has
    12·2 answers
  • NEED ASAP!! 100pts!!
    13·2 answers
  • Why did colonist left britain and came to america
    10·2 answers
  • Which answer best completes the chart?
    6·1 answer
  • Acrostic poem for Napoleon
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!