1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
5

Should the U.S. be able to restrict the rights of its' citizens during wartime? Why or why not? Us​

History
1 answer:
dezoksy [38]3 years ago
7 0
This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
You might be interested in
Starting in 1600 BC, describe the groups who controlled Babylon and how each group or person came to power. (Site 1)
Aleksandr [31]
Amortite is what another person typed on another but this is what I found

7 0
3 years ago
The U.S. wanted to remain neutral in World War II because
Zepler [3.9K]
I think it’s D but if not it’s B
3 0
3 years ago
Which was not part of the irish experience on their arrival in the united states in the late 1840s and 1850s?
Ghella [55]
Soon after their arrival most Irish became strong proponents fo the Republican Party
7 0
3 years ago
Compare maps of the world in ancient times with current political maps.
luda_lava [24]

Answer::Florida

Explanation:

this is the right trust me

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some of the challenges the federal and state governments face in trying to implement a fair tax system?. Give at least
vekshin1
<span>(1) No two people agree on just what would be "fair".

(2) Even if there were agreement, the people with political clout have no reason to want a "fair" system; they want a system that benefits them. There is a reason the Republicans have been pushing through tax cuts for the rich.

(3) The tax "system" includes all the taxes: local, state, and federal. If you want the entire system to be fair, it has to be changed as a whole, not piece by piece. And that would make it hard to start and hard to maintain (any change in tax rates would also have to be coordinated) </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you are a jury member, which of these are topics you might discuss with the other jurors during trial? (Select all that apply
    6·2 answers
  • What is the difference between artifact and fossil please help me asap pleaseeee I’ll give brainlist
    15·1 answer
  • What is a scientific test
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the 19th president of the united states?​
    6·2 answers
  • Why is how you treat someone so important?
    10·2 answers
  • The last battle of the American War for Independence was fought at
    12·1 answer
  • The wagner act also known as the national labor relations act (1935) created this agency who had the responsibility and power to
    7·1 answer
  • A citizen lives in a country in which he must be completely loyal to the government and obedient to its ruler.
    6·1 answer
  • It has been suggested that Senators actually appoint federal district judges, and Presidents
    7·1 answer
  • The organization of labor into unions eventually led to which of the following reforms?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!