He took a tone that was quite lyrical and expressed the need to end the war.
In his gettysburg address Lincoln started to redefine the Civil War as a struggle for human equality not only to save the Union. He extolled the memory of those who died during the Gettysburg battle.
In his second inauguration adress the defeat of the South was very close and he tried to appease his audience by advocating a fair treatment of the South.
Answer:
Explanation:
In Oedipus the King, Sophocles uses blindness and sight as metaphors. Tiresias a physically blind man has a clearer vision than the king Oedipus. Tiresias states "So, you mock my blindness? Let me tell you this, you with your precious eyes, you’re blind to the corruption of your life, to the house you live in, those you live with” (Sophocles 470-475). Blindness is used as a metaphor for the loss of identity, power, and hope. Meanwhile, a clear vision is used as a metaphor for knowledge and insight. The protagonist Oedipus is "Blind" "You have not the truth. You’re blind. Blind in your eyes. Blind in your ears. Blind in your mind” (Sophocles 40). The truth holds power, a power only those with clear sight can see, in the end, Oedipus’s downfall is his blindness, and he ends up being powerless. ok all good please give brailiest :)
B) Yes, because it highlights the importance of volunteers to the growth of the organization.
Answer: The Sevenths mans view changes as time goes on many times in the story. At first he beileved that K had smiled at him in between the first and second wave. Then he starts remembering it a little less and doesn't look down on it as hard when he moves away.
Answer:
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter.
Explanation:
James Wilmot, a reverend and literary scholar came up with an idea in 1781 that Shakespeare was not Shakespeare. He went to the house that William Shakespeare lived during his lifetime, and went through all the libraries in his Stratford residence and searched for correspondence.
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter. He did not find Shakespeare signatures on the bottom of the old letters that were seen. He also stated that there was no property, belonging to Shakespeare, that was written on the on the endpapers of a Bible.
James Wilmot concluded that the plays of Shakespeare could not have been written by someone who did not leave an literary paper trail behind him.
