Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation the states had significant amounts of power while the central government had very little power.
Explanation:
The articles of confederation initially created by the founding fathers to make sure that the central government cannot violate the right of the citizens through tyrannical action.
This is the reason why they designed it so the central government had very little power over the states.
But, several problems occurred because of this system of government. For example, It is became really hard for the central government to collect taxes from the states. The earliest form of the articles of the Confederation didn't provide the central government with the power to overrule states' authority in case they make violations like not paying taxes.
Answer:
Explanation:
It also shows how the two international treaties addressing the rights of women and children and the committees that monitor them can be used to effectively address four major development issues: promoting the human rights of adolescent girls, eliminating child marriage, preventing the spread of HIV and reducing maternal mortality.
1. Its a painting. Produced in 1823. Audience I'm guessing workers
2. Well it looks like they're building a road so id say we were affected greatly because we use roads as major source of transportation
Hope this helps
Answer:
D. many nations wanted to gain economic independence
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
