What was Grigori Rasputin's

History

2 answers:

natali 33 [55]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A. He grew close to Alexandra, who gave him considerable political power.

Explanation:

Rasputin was well known for his "healing" abilities. The Romanovs' son Alexei had hemophilia, which meant he could bleed out. Rasputin supposedly saved the boy, and the Romanovs kept him in the palace. When the Tsar went to war, Alexandra was left in charge, so she got help from Grigori. Many believe that they had a romantic relationship, but no evidence has ever been found. Alexandra gave Rasputin political power to help her run the country while her husband was away.

wolverine [178]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

I would say the answer is B

Explanation:

Rasputin's scandalous and sinister reputation helped discredit the tsarist government.

You might be interested in

1. An expository essay instructs, provides information, or explains. In this research essay, you are presenting information and

hodyreva [135]

Answer:

This is all stuff that you have to do on ur own... becasue i can't write you an essay

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did the iron smelting industry in India decline in the 19th century

Nitella [24]

One reason was the new forest laws.when the colonial govn. prevented people from entering the reserved forests,the iron smelters could not find wood for charcoal and could not get iron ore

5 0

4 years ago

What environmental problems does the world face today

Romashka [77]

Pollution, litter, and cars

7 0

4 years ago

Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)

diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0

3 years ago

How did the people get the news during the revolutionary period?

Marizza181 [45]

Answer: They got the news from the newspaper

6 0

3 years ago