1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovikov84 [41]
2 years ago
10

Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)

. Do you agree that the principle is so important for Rule Of Law? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
diamong [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

You might be interested in
Why Only White People Are Racist? Isn't There Black People Who Are Racist?
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

Yes, there are racist people within all races. The majority of people are not racist in United States though.

Explanation:

The MSM claims are false about so much white supremacists.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"We have not sought to extend our territorial possessions by conquest, or our republican institutions over a reluctant people. I
forsale [732]

Answer:

c. reluctance of the U.S government to negotiate treaties with Canada

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors unified the Muslim Empire across three continents
Assoli18 [71]
<span>The Islamic Empire spread across parts of Africa, Europe, and Asia. The empire was very powerful, and also very warlike.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Real story of naroto?
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

lol this ha to be the funniest question i have ever seen its catogorized as history too

Explanation:

.

5 0
3 years ago
Did the Feudal society gave equal educational and artistic opportunities to men and women alike
HACTEHA [7]

The correct answer to this open question is "No."

No, Feudal society did not give equal educational and artistic opportunities to men and women alike.

The role of men was totally different than women's role. Indeed, it was a men's society.  During the Middle Ages, peasant women were housewives and raised children. On the other hand, noblewomen participated in social events and could own some property. It was very important for noblewomen to give her husband a son.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • From john 18:36, what is the "nature" of the kingdom -physical or spiritual?
    6·1 answer
  • The Mughal Empire was established by who
    8·1 answer
  • The best definition for foreign policy is how one country chooses
    13·2 answers
  • Between 1916 and 1917 __________________ of men died; at the Battle of Verdun alone more than 700,000 died; the war had turned t
    5·2 answers
  • Which descriptions of the English colonies in North America are correct? Choose all answers that are correct.
    15·2 answers
  • Invention did the Estucans have and the Romans adapted as their own?
    8·1 answer
  • What role did francis ferdinand play in ww1 starting?
    5·2 answers
  • By the end of the 1800's, the use of vertical and horizontal consolidation, not to mention trusts resulted in
    10·1 answer
  • Franklin has been convicted of a misdemeanor. Which of these would he MOST likely have been convicted of committing?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following mountain ranges is NOT located in Europe?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!