Answer:
1: The correction option is B) Negative
Explanation
In economic theory, the Philips curve depicts the relationship between unemployment and inflation as a negative one. In order words, when inflation goes up, unemployment reduces.
The logic behind that thinking is, that inflation, which is the general increase in prices of goods/commodities and services is good for business. Business owners are quick to adjust to higher prices regardless of how it is induced and sometimes even profit from it in sectors not affected by inflation. So in such sectors, as business improves, it is assumed that there is a requirement to being in more hands to help with the expansion of the business.
2. The correct option is B) Holds for certain time periods
Explanation
Social scientists and researchers have plotted the data across various periods (20 years) using data from the US economy.
The following results emerged:
- the traditional relationship between inflation and unemployment held in 2001 during the mild recession triggered by the 9/11 situation. Unemployment took an upward spiral averaging an increase of 6% while inflation nosedived by 2.5%;
- Another snapshot was taken in the mid-2000s. This time unemployment went belly-up by several degrees, while inflation took off in the opposite direction by almost 5% before receding in 2006 when unemployment bottomed;
- In another analysis, the consumer price index took a steep downward dive during the Great Recession. This time, unemployment took a bullish charge, going up as much as 10%
- This negative relationship failed to hold between 2012 to 2015. Both factors developed a positive relationship and moved in the same direction;
- There has also been a loss of strength in the negative relationship as also seen in recent times. Specifically, between 2016 to 2019 where unemployment has steadily receded to 50-year lows, with inflation remained steady at an average of 2%.
So the correct answer is B.
3. The correct answer is True:
Explanation
As seen from the analysis above, the negative relationship remains largely true for most of the periods examined. Hence it is more pragmatic to expect a dip in unemployment whenever there is a spike in the CPI.
Cheers
For the first one, you have to convert the fractions to an improper fraction. To do that you need to multiply the bottom denominator number (3) by the whole number (1) then you need to add the numinator, so 3x1+2= 5. You have to keep the denominator so 1 2/3 is equal to 5/3. Then do the same to 2 1/5, and you get 11/5. Now you have to find a common denominator, that's basically the smallest number that both numbers can go Into, the lowest common denominator for 3 and 5 is 15. So 3x5= 15, so we have to multiply the top number by 5 which is 25. So 5/3 is equal to 25/15, then 5x3= 15, so you need to multiply 11 by 3 which is 33. So 11/5 is equal to 33/15. Then you add them. Add the numinators (25+33=58. Then you keep the denominator 15. So when u add it it's 58/15 then you need to simplify that and you get 3 13/15.
The second one you turn them into improper fractions like I told you how to before (multiply the bottom number by the whole number then add he top number, then add he same denominator.) do that for both. Then you line them right next to each other and multiply across. (I just realized that they were the same number so they are equal to 5/3 and 11/5)
Then you do 5x11 and you get 55 then do 3x5 and you get 15. 55/15 is your answer, but you need to simplify it, you need to divide 55 by 15, (not all the way just the first number) so you do 15x3 and that's 45, then you subtract that from 55, and you get 10, so then you take your denominator (15) and you answer is 3 10/15. But when you simplify it it's 3 and 2/3
Hope I helped sorry it's so long and sorry for any typos it's so long I didn't go back and check
Answer:
4k+11
Step-by-step explanation:
There you go. Happy to help.
Answer:
The answer is All integers where n ≥ 1
Hope this helps!
Answer:
y=0
Step-by-step explanation:
x y
-2 0.04
-1 0.2
0 1
1 5
2 25
