Answer:
Can you attach an image of the political cartoon? otherwise I can't help :(
Answer:It's B, C, and A
Explanation:Sharecropping sounded a lot better than it really was, it hurt the freed slaves more than helped them in the long run.
Hard power is the ability of a sovereign nation to be able to influence the decisions of another country through either military action or economic blackouts.
Some examples include:
- Economic sanctions
- Military action like air strikes, invasions, etc
- Withdrawal of medical aid, etc.
Soft power is the power of a country to use diplomatic means to resolve issues in another country or to help influence decisions without war.
Some examples include:
- Diplomatic talks with the ambassador
- Cultural exchange, etc
Please note that your question is incomplete as you did not give complete details and as a result of this, i would give a general overview.
As a result of this, both hard power and soft power can help to resolve conflict and de-escalate issues
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/12169321
Answer:
If you are referring to the PN Shah campaign for the Unification of Nepal. This statement is false.
Explanation:
PN Shah's campaign for the unification of Nepal did not have diplomacy as an important and effective element. This is because this was one of the most violent and aggressive campaigns in all of history, where unification was promoted through the military conquest of important regions for the kingdom of Nepal. In this case, PN Shah scheduled the invasion and redemption of the Kathmandu Valley, Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur regions. These invasions had no diplomatic element, but they were made on the basis of military power.
Answer:
I believe it's the "kingdom" periods
