Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.
To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
First one goes in the second
The correct answer is D; Gather party members' votes for upcoming bills.
Further Explanation:
The floor leaders are voted into the position by their party members on the first day of their session. Each house has their own floor leaders. The floor leaders help to gather votes for their own party. Even though most of the politicians vote on party lines, many times they will vote for the other party during certain times. It is the leaders who will try to sway the voters to stay in line and vote for the party or sway the other side from voting with their party.
There are two floor leaders at all times. They are the majority and minor floor leaders. Which ever party has more members will be the majority with the lesser members having the minority role.
Learn more about floor leaders at brainly.com/question/12952266
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
What might be unfair is if the person is trying to say there side but the cop is not listening to the persons reason for why they did it
Explanation:
for my explanation is to just worry about you and if the cops try to say any smart comment don't say anything because all ur gonna do is put yourself in a big hole of trouble
Answer:
Article V of the Constitution provides two ways to propose amendments to the document. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures.
Explanation:
