Answer:
Sugar act, Mutiny act, Stamp act
Explanation:
Sugar Act: brought down obligation on molasses, expanded on sugar. Intended to stop unlawful sugar exchange between sugar islands and pioneers. Preceding this demonstration British disregarded it. Incensed pilgrims since it was a wellspring of salary for them.
Mutiny Act: act called for homesteaders to room and accommodate them. Homesteaders angry=no requirement for insurance.
Stamp Act: put charge on totally printed reports. Chafed pilgrims since bars were the "Twitter" of the day. A stamp should have been set on everything. Homesteaders were furious about the change.
Answer:
If I'm thinking right and remember correctly the answer to this question is D: One that was balanced so that it could govern, but not oppress, the people.
Answer:
Explanation:
The international community condemned the Armenian Genocide. In May 1915, Great Britain, France, and Russia advised the Young Turk leaders that they would be held personally responsible for this crime against humanity. There was a strong public outcry in the United States against the mistreatment of the Armenians. At the end of the war, the Allied victors demanded that the Ottoman government prosecute the Young Turks accused of wartime crimes. Relief efforts were also mounted to save "the starving Armenians." The American, British, and German governments sponsored the preparation of reports on the atrocities and numerous accounts were published. On the other hand, despite the moral outrage of the international community, no strong actions were taken against the Ottoman Empire either to sanction its brutal policies or to salvage the Armenian people from the grip of extermination. Moreover, no steps were taken to require the postwar Turkish governments to make restitution to the Armenian people for their immense material and human losses.
B because u can think abt pacing pacing
