Answer:
The total capacity of the market in core products less the Digby's Deft is 10860 thousand units.
Explanation:
In order to completely answer the question, the complete question is found online. This question was missing some table attachments which are attached with it.
From the table, it is first noted that the core products are listed which are as below:
- Axe
- Bolt
- Buzz
- Deft
- Dim
Now as mentioned in the question, deft is to be ignored so the remaining options are:
- Axe
- Bolt
- Buzz
- Dim
Now the capacities of these are included which are found from the table and are as follow:
Axe=2050
Bolt=1040
Buzz=1040
Dim=1300
So the total capacity of 1 shift is
Axe+Bolt+Buzz+Dim=2050+1040+1040+1300=5430 units
As there are two shifts running so the total capacity is 5430x2=10860
So the total capacity of market in core products less the Digby's Deft is 10860 thousand units.
it looks to me that the answer could be C
Explanation:
it may be C
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Suppose a firm's CFO thinks that an externality is present in a project, but that it cannot be quantified with any precision ¾ estimates of its effect would really just be guesses. In this case, the externality should be ignored ¾ i.e., not considered at all ¾ because if it were considered it would make the analysis appear more precise than it really is. This is a false statement.
Answer:
The answer is: C) decreases ; increases
Explanation:
The real cost of borrowing is calculated by adjusting the nominal cost of borrowing by the inflation rate. This means that if the inflation rate increases, then the adjusted real cost of borrowing will decrease.
The inflation rate increases when country´s money supply growth rate outpaces its economic growth. So when the inflation rate increases (lowering the real cost of borrowing), borrowers are more likely to issue bonds, increasing the bond supply.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
