Answer:
16.65$
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No, They are not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
The two expressions are only said to be equivalent if they are the same regardless of whatever value the variable(s) is.
The variable in this question is x.
To prove this, we equate both expressions:
This shows that they have the same value ONLY when x is 1.
This is why Andre says that they are equivalent, but they are not.
Answer:
No. It is a constant function.
Step-by-step explanation:
The function f(x) = e^2 is not an exponential functional. Rather, it is a constant function. The reason for this is that in f(x) = e^2, there is no x involved on the right hand side of the equation. The approximate value of e is 2.718281, and the approximate value of 2.718281^2 is 7.389051. This means that f(x) = e^2 = 7.389051. It is important to note that for any value of x, the value of the function remains fixed. This is because the function does not involve the variable x in it. The graph of the function will be a line parallel to the x-axis, and the y-intercept will be 7.389051. For all the lines parallel to x-axis, the value of the function remains the same irrespective of the value of x. Also, the derivative of the function with respect to x is 0, which means that the value of the function is unaffected by the change in the value of x!!!
I think u just subtract 35° from 130° and that should be the angle of x
