I think the difference is caused by a person or group actually going through with genocide versus an attempt at it, but that's just my best guess?
Answer:
Southerners felt that the proclamation was not a law at all and just a political stunt by Lincoln.
Explanation:
The proclamation was aimed at freeing slaves .
The south had already been taken away , its representatives were taken to the congress with supervision .
This one was not taken as freedom since it was only supposed to happen on the rebellious states .
President Abraham Lincoln used the "Vacate Congressional seats " tactic to know which of the states were still on rebellion.
Answer:
plessy vs Fergusons decision in a 7 to 1 decision is segregation is constitutional. brown vs board of education decided in a unanimous decision that segregation is unconstitutional. miranda vs Arizona decide in a 5 to 4 decision that an accused persons 5th amendment rights must be protected
Answer:
The new countries created after colonization were in fact new countries.
Explanation:
As you may already know, colonization created new frontiers across the African continent, which allowed the creation of new countries that did not exist before colonization. These borders were maintained after colonization which allowed the creation of new countries, but not only that. Colonization promoted a mixture of cultures and customs that differentiated the African people to the point that it was not possible to unite them in a single country, even if the borders were redrawn. This mixture of cultures and customs created even more differences among African peoples, strengthening the creation of new countries after colonization.
Answer:
I believe that was Ivan III of Russia. I hope this helps :)
