Answer:
hold power with the upper house legislative
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This statement correctly identifies a characteristic of the <em>nolo contendere</em> plea. This is a legal term that expresses the desire to not contend. Therefore, this is also known as a plea of no contest. This is considered a plea in which the defendant neither admits nor disputes a charge. This may lead to a determination of guilt, but it is inadmissible in later civil cases against the defendant based on the same conduct amounting to the criminal violation.
Answer:
They are called Criminologists
Explanation:
Answer:
The Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark case that determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This case is significant in regards to the Second Amendment because it affirms that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and not just a right that pertains to militias.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Motion for the extension of time for release of evidence
Explanation:
This is a pretrial application made by the prosecuting attorney on behalf of the claimant seeking for an extension of time for the release of evidence by the prime witnesses in order to prove the guilt of the accused person in the commission of the offence of arson.
In otherwords, Eleanor as the prosecuting attorney who has a strong case against the defendant needs time to prove to the court that the defendant is guilty of the offence of arson through the evidence of the prime eye-witnesses who were present at the scene where the offence was committed.
