<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
England is known for their monarchial system of government. Patrick Henry use persuasive language in the passage when;
- He appeals to emotion by asserting that his proposal is the only way to avoid enslavement by the British monarchy.
- He appeals to logic by asking his audience to look back at history for evidence of how the British government is likely to act towards them in the future.
The classical argument is known to consist of different parts. The order are;
- Exordium: This is the introduction, opening, or hook
- Narratio: This is known as the context or background of the topic
- Proposito and Partitio: This is known as the claim or the argument etc.
In the passage, Henry engages his audience by paying them respect. He acknowledge, recognizes and praise the patriotism and abilities of the other members of the Convention.
Learn more about this Passage from
brainly.com/question/11993288
5 is the answer to your question
