1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
2 years ago
11

I WILL GIVE BRAINILEST

English
1 answer:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1: ("The Little Horn Massacre") In this passage, the author's choice of wording and overall language have shown the reader a clear bias throughout the different parts of the text. For example, as stated in the text, "Custer was among the last who fell, but when his cheering voice was no longer heard, the Indians made easy work of the remainder.". This quote shown by the author proves that "Custer" was very important in many parts of the entire situation also showing that the author tells this perspective of the story based off Custer's point of view. The writers bias was taken against "Reno" as in the story and this is proven by this quote given in the example when again the story was told as Custer's way of seeing the scenario. If the story was reversed, the ending quote would have been about the effect on "Reno" not "Custer".

2: In, "The Battle of Greasy Grass", the point was shared with the viewer that the war, "was a watershed moment in History of Indigenous -  U.S. relations.". Then, in the passage titled, "The Little Horned Massacre", the war was also remembered as a disaster for the United States. In both sources, it explains similar outcomes of the war, but these messages are different by being effected through the story by the perspective in the writing. As stated in the text labeled, "The Battle of Greasy Grass", The U.S. soldiers gave themselves away with a dust cloud rising up as they approached the Greasy Grass encampment. The Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho warriors were quickly ready. Crazy Horse led as many as 1,000 warriors to flank Custer's forces." This quote shows the quote would be spoken in 3rd person on behalf of the U.S. in this situation. Then, in the passage of, "The Little Horn Massacre", "The soldiers were repulsed and a wholesale slaughter ensued. Gen. Custer, his brother, his nephew, and his brother-in-law were killed, and not one of his detachment escaped.". Both of these examples show sentences from each source further proving how major this point in time was and much of any effect it had made, told as part of the message. But, if the perspectives were changed in either or both text, the thoughts of the scenario would change based on opinion and the message would too.

3:  While reading, "The Death of Gen. Custer: Sitting Bull Tells the Story of the Fight",  the purpose was to give details about the death of Custer from the perspective of his enemy, Sitting Bull. But, the death of Custer has still remained un-solved. Although, even though there are not many details proving this claim, Custer's enemy could be guilty for this incident. One of these examples would be stating, "Sioux and said: 'Custer is not in this division; he is in the other.' I then ordered all my men to come on and attack the other division.". This has proven that he was originally targeting Custer because The Sitting Bull lead his soldiers towards another group seeing Custer was not in his attacking rang at the time. Afterwards, The Sitting Bull had talked about the founding of the body of Custer and talked about it as anyone else who had been attacked then.

Explanation:

I'm so sorry i'm 6 days late. I had the same assignment so here take my work.

You might be interested in
A summary of the new Jim Crow book version
enot [183]

Alexander details the history of “racialized social control” (20). From slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration, she identifies a persistent pattern by which systems of racial subjugation are built, maintained, dismantled, and finally transformed to fit the circumstances of a given era. In the case of mass incarceration, politicians like Ronald Reagan built the system to fit into a new post-Civil Rights Movement paradigm that prohibited politicians from making overtly racist appeals to American voters. In this new era of supposed colorblindness, Reagan—and later George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton—utilized “law and order” (50) rhetoric that implicitly demonized Black men as predators. In the middle of Reagan’s presidency, crack cocaine swept through urban communities of color, giving “tough on crime” advocates the perfect pretext to launch an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against Black American males.

 Alexander explains exactly how the new racial caste system works, beginning with its point of entry: the police. Empowered by Supreme Court decisions that effectively gutted the Fourth Amendment, police officers may stop and search individuals under the faintest pretexts of probable cause. Yet just because police departments can target millions of Americans suspected of possessing small amounts of drugs, the question remains of why they choose to divert time and resources away from addressing more serious crimes like murders and rapes. Alexander points to huge financial incentives offered by the federal government to encourage widespread enforcement of minor drug infractions. Massive federal cash grants and changes to civil asset forfeiture laws have made participation in the drug war extraordinarily lucrative for state and local police departments.

In the following chapter Alexander explores why, in many states, Black Americans make up as much as 80% to 90% of individuals who serve time in prison on drug charges, even though the system is formally colorblind and whites use and sell drugs at similar rates. Unlike in the case of robberies or assaults, where clear victims exist, those involved with drug transactions are unlikely to report them to the police because doing so would implicate themselves in a crime. As a result, police must be proactive in addressing drug crime and are therefore afforded an enormous amount of discretion concerning whom to target. As for why police departments choose to disproportionately target people of color, Alexander blames both implicit biases and pervasive media and political campaigns that frame Black men as criminals in the American imagination. Prosecutors are also granted an outsized amount of discretion thanks to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for drug criminals. With such harsh sentences hanging over the heads of those charged with drug crimes, prosecutors are better empowered to extract plea deals. While these plea deals may keep an individual out of jail, they also frequently result in a felony record, saddling that person for life with what Alexander calls “the prison label” (189). The consequences of this prison label are the focus of Chapter 4. When an individual leaves prison or accepts a felony plea deal, they face legal discrimination in employment, housing, welfare benefits, and often voting rights. It is here that Alexander observes the strongest similarities between mass incarceration and the Jim Crow era, given that Black Americans faced these same forms of discrimination during the first half of the 20th century in the South. She also addresses the stigma felt by everyone touched by the criminal justice system, which includes the formerly incarcerated, their families, and any individual who can expect daily harassment from police officers. The following chapter outlines the specific similarities and differences between Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Aside from the legal discrimination in both systems, Jim Crow and mass incarceration have similar political roots. Both systems gained political support from elites who sought to exploit the economic and cultural fears of poor and working-class whites. Both operate by defining what it means to be Black in America in the cultural imagination—in the case of mass incarceration, that means defining Black men as criminals. Perhaps the most significant and frightening difference is that while both slavery and Jim Crow were systems of labor exploitation, mass incarceration involves marginalization and removal from society. Alexander points out that similar racially based marginalization efforts were precursors to genocides in the 20th century.

3 0
3 years ago
7) When filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a person must
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

and pay debts over time, ... It enables individuals with regular income to develop a plan to repay all or part ...

8 0
2 years ago
Btw any anime recommendation?
sergeinik [125]

probably really basic ones but i like boku no hero academia, jujutsu kaisen and hmmm erased is alright too

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence has an intransitive verb?
Llana [10]

The sentence that has an intransitive verb is A. Many soldiers volunteered freely.

An intransitive verb is one that is <em>not followed by a direct object</em>, meaning that there is not a thing or person that receives the action described by the verb. In this sentence, the verb<em> volunteer</em> is followed by an adverb of manner, and there is not a person or thing directly affected by the action.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is the best example of a supporting
kondaur [170]

Answer:

a only a small percentage of taxpayer money goes to national

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from “On Women’s Right to Vote,” an 1873 speech by Susan B. Anthony.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the figure of speech of the story of keesh and the purpose of it
    7·2 answers
  • 2. Read these lines from the poem.
    5·1 answer
  • Read the quotes from a character in The Princess Bride and then answer the question.
    6·1 answer
  • In the limerick below, select the boxes next to the lines which have three strong beats and rhyme with each other.
    15·1 answer
  • What is a tension that runs through the entire story in notes of a native son
    14·1 answer
  • Read this letter written by US General Ulysses S. Grant. Which sentences most clearly indicate that the writing style is informa
    5·2 answers
  • Identify the correct citation format for a quote from page 12 of the book Balancing Act, by Jill Caan, published in 2005 by Alph
    9·2 answers
  • "Such occasions arise in the life of the man who is a pure seeker after truth and who would seek to serve the humanity and his c
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Kaydee's personal narrative.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!