The answer is A.
He ran for six (6) miles every day. 4 in the morning and 2 at night = 6 per day.
He did this for four (4) days. The way to figure this would be to go 6 * 4. This equals 24 miles.
Go back a few steps (punny!).
So days multiplied by how many miles he ran a day which is calculated by miles in morning added to miles at night.
days*(miles per morning + miles per night)
days=4
miles per morning=4
miles per night = 2
4 * (4+2)
Calculating this out....
4 * (4+2)
(4+2 = 6)
4 * 6 = 24.
So A is the answer.
Answer:
I believe its b, bc the slope is negitive
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Substitute -8 as x into the equation.
h(-8)=-2(-8+5)^2+4
h(-8)=-2(-3)^2+4
h(-8)=-2(9)+4
h(-8)=-18+4
h(-8)=-14
:)
Answer:
A. Valid
Step-by-step explanation:
The P-value is the probability of getting this result or sample statistic if the null hypothesis is true. That is why a low P-value (smaller than the significance level) is considered evidence to reject the null hypothesis, because the result has little probability of being due to chance.
The statement that the P-value is "the probability of getting results as extreme as or more extreme than the ones in this study if the drug is actually not effective" is valid, as the null hypothesis states generally the opposite of the objective of the study (demonstrate that the drug is effective), and the very low value of the P-value is indicative that this result, if the drug was not effective, has a very low probability.
