Answer:
Mark me as brainlist
Explanation:
The original Constitution of 1788 contained very few specific restrictions on the ways in which the power of the national government could be exercised against the people. It guaranteed the right to trial by jury in criminal (but not civil) cases, placed limits on prosecutions and punishments for treason, forbade bills of attainder (laws aimed at particular persons) and ex post facto laws (laws that punished conduct that was legal when it happened), limited any restrictions on habeas corpus to certain designated emergencies, and prohibited the granting of titles of nobility. But the Constitution that emerged from the 1787 Constitutional Convention contained nothing like a comprehensive bill of rights. Most state constitutions of the time had bills of rights, and many citizens—and members of the Constitutional Convention—expected the new national constitution to have one as well. Nonetheless, the state delegations at the Constitutional Convention voted 10-0 against including a bill of rights in the Constitution.
Answer:
1. We need a lawyer because they can defend us in front of the Jury if we do something bad.
2. We don't have to buy from those kinds of people and those kinds of stores, but it is often thought that they have good quality and everything which includes that.
3. Well, if you don't pay your electricity bill, they're going to turn the electricity off. If you don't pay your water bill your water will get turned off. And if you don't pay your loans your house might be put to sale because you have to give money in one way or another, and if you don't have any money you might end up in prison.
4. Because it's safer to keep your money in a bank instead of your pocket. They can take your materialistic things, but cannot take the money from the bank unless they know your password (which you should only know and should never write anywhere).
5. As I said in the previous one, someone may come across your password which can result in all your money being taken unless you block your bank account and report it to the police. There are many different scenarios about this situation and the procedure is long (I think) trying to get a new card with a bank account.
Those are the answers to your questions. Have a good day :-)
No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
