1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentinak56 [21]
3 years ago
11

Supporters feel that the penalty should exceed the true value of the crime.

Law
2 answers:
andre [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

its c i hope this helpss

Explanation:

natka813 [3]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h3>retribution.</h3>

Explanation:

Retribution is the process of inflicting punishment to criminals according to the degree of crime they have committed. The punishment is normally proportional to the offence so that the offender would feel guilty of his/her actions.

The supporters of retribution feel that offenders should be punished according to the nature of the crime they have committed and may sometimes should be inflicted with greater penalty than the true value of the crime.

They believe that this will deter the offender from committing the same crime again as well as act as a deterrent to potential future criminals.

You might be interested in
Defensive driving level 1, 300 word essay to the judge for speeding
Soloha48 [4]
Just write your own essay and then use quilbot
6 0
3 years ago
What important group of people might NOT be included in the National Crime Victimization Survey?
EastWind [94]

Answer:

B, runaways or homeless.

<h3><em>I hope this helped at all.</em></h3>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should cereal be considered a soup?!?​
Kryger [21]

Answer:

if yes, i would say a cold soup maybe lol and can i have brainliest pls thanks?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What effect did Ruth Bader Ginsburg have on the Virginia Military Institute?
Vlad [161]

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

She ruled that the school had to pay women the same as men.

3 0
3 years ago
Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being consci
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.

Explanation:

Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these political stances would not align with the Democratic party
    7·2 answers
  • When can an individual be arrested for a felony in California?
    14·1 answer
  • in my government class i have a question that asks what general limitation is placed on individual rights
    13·1 answer
  • Explain how a person becomes a Supreme Court justice.
    6·1 answer
  • Should lawyers be allowed to advertise
    11·2 answers
  • This philosopher did not like monarchies?
    6·1 answer
  • It is possible to amend (or change) a bill in committee or on the floor during debate.
    15·2 answers
  • What reasons can you give for excluding from jury service members of the
    6·1 answer
  • Imagine the white car in the left lane is moving more slowly than the surrounding traffic. How is this a violation of state unif
    9·1 answer
  • What might happen without the responsibility of citizens to pay taxes or defend the nation?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!