What accurately describes the relationship between the ideas is that the Sentence 2 provides supporting evidence for the reason stated in sentence 1.
<h3>What are the two statement?</h3>
- Consuming too much sugar can lead to dangerous medical conditions.
- People may develop obesity, tooth decay, or adult-onset diabetes.
Hence, the relationship between the ideas is that the Sentence 2 provides supporting evidence for the reason stated in sentence 1.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about supporting evidence
<em>brainly.com/question/9049627</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
The process of cause and effect involving Burmese pythons is similar to the changes in Africa in that they are both talking about how the seemingly innocent actions of humans (cause) led to greater problems in the animal ecosystems (effect).
Explanation:
The Burmese pythons are not native to the Everglades, their presence their can be traced back to the likely fact that they were the pythons (or their descendants), used as pets by humans who later released them into the wild. This action lead to the pythons adapting really well to the ecosystem and consequently hunting some of the native species close to extinction.
Similarly in Africa, humans hunted lions and leopards which drastically reduced their population, which in turn lead to a higher population of a certain type of baboon previously prey to the lions and leopards. This gave rise to a higher rates of parasites in humans and the baboons.
Thus the similarity lies in this: human action (introducing the pythons into the Everglades) in Burmese pythons in the Everglades (cause) led to the near extinction of some native species (effect) that the pythons prey on.
Also, in All the Pieces Matter, humans hunting lions and leopards (cause) led to increase in a baboon population which led to increase in parasites in the baboons and humans (effect).
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
I find reading extremely boring therefore making it hard to stay motivated.
I see you have already provided an answer. I will, however, develop it further.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>The external events in "The Most Dangerous Game", a short story by Richard Connell, affect an internal change within the main character, Sanger Rainsford. </u>Rainsford is a famous hunter, who also happens to be quite arrogant about his luck and position in life. He does not care about what <u>the animals </u>he hunts feel. <u>Rainsford is unable to empathize with their fear.</u> According to him, the world is divided into hunters and huntees, and he is lucky to belong to the former instead of the latter.
However, Rainsford's luck changes drastically once he accidentally lands on General Zaroff's island. Zaroff, like Rainsford, is a hunter incapable of empathy for his prey. The difference lies in the fact that the general has grown tired of hunting irrational beasts. He now hunts man. And since Rainsford sees this as murder and refuses to hunt alongside him, Zaroff decides to make Rainsford his new prey.
<u>Of course this conflict is bound to cause Rainsford to change internally. Just like an animal, Rainsford is at a disadvantage. He does not possess a gun, while Zaroff carries one and uses hound dogs to help him in his hunt. Rainsford is now no different than one of the beasts he used to hunt. Fear of death is what drives him - the basic instinct to survive that every single animal in the world has. </u>
<u>Of course, Rainsford is a human being. He is rational and intelligent enough to find a way to beat Zaroff. Still, until that happens, he suffers the agony of having to run for his life, to hide in fear. The external event of becoming a prey certainly changes Rainsford into a man capable of empathizing.</u>
