Answer:
The correct option is: maintenance rehearsal; elaborative rehearsal
Explanation:
Memory rehearsal is described as the practice or mental technique by which information is processed and retained as a memory.
The two types of memory rehearsal are: maintenance rehearsal and elaborative rehearsal
The maintenance rehearsal refers to the process of storing the given information in the working or short-term memory. It involves repetition of the information without understanding or connecting with other information stored in the memory
Whereas, elaborative rehearsal involves understanding the given information and connecting with other information stored in the memory. This method involves retaining the information in the long-term memory.
Therefore, Nora is maintenance rehearsal. Whereas, Miles is using elaborative rehearsal.
The different characteristics of democracy are related to the types of democracy that currently exist.
These types and their characteristics are:
Direct democracy: This democracy allows all citizens of a region to participate directly in the establishment of policies. This type of democracy was exercised in Athens and allowed any citizen (women and slaves not to be considered) to be able to present a bill, in addition to voting on the bills presented. Not only that, citizens could also participate directly in the region's legislative and executive power.
Representative democracy: It is the type of democracy used in republican and parliamentary countries. it is the most common type today and allows citizens to participate in the formation of policies indirectly, through the choice of their representatives, through the election of those who form the legislative and executive power.
Participatory democracy: It can be considered a semi-direct democracy. This is because it allows citizens to vote for their representatives, but it also allows citizens to participate directly in their country's governmental decisions.
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
If he wants the study to meet scientific standards then the study needs to adhere to the scientific method. The scientific method is made up of several steps.
Step 1: Define the question he wants to ask. So in this it would be something along the lines of, how do people interact with one another.
Step 2: Then do background research into the subject matter.
Step 3: Construct/devise a hypothesis. What does he expect the outcome of the study to be.
Step 4: Test his hypothesis by carrying out the experiment. Make it clear what kind of experiment he intends on using for example an observation.
Step 5: Analyze the data gathered from the experiment.
Step 6. Draw a conclusion from the results.
Step 7: Share the results through writing a report/article.
As a site investigator who receives a copy of an expedited safety report that represents an increased risk to the study participants, you need to Report to local IRB.
<h3>Who is a Local IRBs/IECs?</h3>
Local IRBs/IECs can be regarded as personel that serves at academic institutions and helps in conducting research and review only their trials.
Therefore, option B is correct because the copy of the expedited safety report represents an increased risk to the study participants .
Learn more about site investigator at:
brainly.com/question/13171394
