An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Matching is as shown below:
1. pronoun with no specific antecedent - indefinite pronoun
2. determined by function - case
3. consistency between subject and verb or pronoun and antecedent - agreement
4. subject case - nominative
5. clarifies or renames preceding noun - appositive
6. clause with implied subject or verb - elliptical clause
7. adjective phrase without word to modify - dangling construction
8. points out which one - demonstrative pronoun
9. two-word pronoun - reciprocal pronoun
<span>Unfortunately you didn't share any options so that I could give you the right answer but I have one suggestion for you. Do not decide to describe the problems with the American legal system if you need to write a five-paragraph essay about a current social issue. Just because this topic is not a shallow one and you will need to analyse loads of information that should be included without reducing the sense. I hope it's clear. I would write something like ''the dangers of using cell phones while driving''.</span>
Answer:
The pathos that Hamlet provokes combined with his courage and nobility is what makes Hamlet the hero of Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
Explanation: