All categories

2 years ago

Of the Financial Reforms, which was the most significant long term? Defend your answer.

Advanced Placement (AP)

1 answer:

vampirchik [111]2 years ago

3 0

The most significant long-term financial reform in the United States is the Glass-Steagall Act.

<h3>What are FInancial Reforms?</h3>

Financial reform is the procedure of transitioning from government-regulated rates of interest to market-determined interest rates and pricing.

It is a policy initiative intended to renationalize and change the financial system in order to achieve an economic liberalization market-oriented system within an adequate regulatory framework.

The Glass-Steagall Act is one of the most significant financial reforms in the United States. This is because it enhanced bank regulation and restricted how banks invested their clients' money.

Learn more about Financial reforms here:

brainly.com/question/25701422

You might be interested in

Retirees are the fastest growing group to go bankrupt <br><br> True or False ?

guajiro [1.7K]

the retirees is false

hdue

4 0

3 years ago

Which Atom or molecule is responsible for breaking up Ozone in the stratosphere?

goldenfox [79]

Chlorine has the potential to break up the ozone layer (along with bromine)

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS DUE IN 10 MINUTES!!!!!!!!

MatroZZZ [7]

D) Applying an equal force at a location farther away from the rock.

6 0

3 years ago

Can anyone help with some of these, i only really need the answers to 3-10

Maru [420]

3 .) they were very advanced, They had sewer systems and two story houses. Had a great bath which was the city center

5.) Historians don’t 100% know why but
Lack of weapons could means they were invaded and had nothing to fight with
There could have been major natural disaster and some believe even a earthquake

8.) Rig veda was the first veda of Hinduism

if this is a reading question make sure my answers line up with the reading
the ones that i didn’t answer go to crash course indus valley you can find most of the answers there

3 0

3 years ago

A. Using information in the graph shown, compare the data trend from 1960 to 2015 for sub-Saharan Africa to the trend shown for

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

A. From the information given in the graph, we have;

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Europe in 1960 is approximately 1,600 Pounds per Acre

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Europe in 2015 is approximately 5,100 Pounds per Acre

The rate of change of grain yield in Europe ≈ (5,100 - 1,600)/(2015 - 1960) = 63. $\overline{63}$ Pounds per Acre per year

The grain yield in pounds per acre for Sub-Saharan Africa in 1960 is approximately 800 Pounds per Acre

The grain yield in pounds per for Sub-Saharan Africa 2015 is approximately 1,250 Pounds per Acre

The rate of change in grain yield in Sub-Saharan Africa ≈ (1,250 - 800)/(2015 - 1960) = 8. $\overline{18}$ Pounds per Acre per year

Therefore, the grain yield per acre per year in Europe is increasing approximately 8 times the increase in Sub-Saharan Africa

B. Given that the rate of increase in the pounds of grain per Acre per year in Europe is progressively increasing above the average rate of world rate, the market for the grains produced in Europe will be partly the developing countries, thereby reducing the number of farms found in developing countries

C. In stage 4 demographic transition the population growth is stabilizing and therefore where there is an increase in grain yields, there will be an increase in farming and economic activity and a reduction in population growth

Where there is a decrease in grain yield, there will be an increase in activities to restore supply and therefore, a reduction in population

D. One limitation of the data in describing food security at a regional scale is the information required on the population figures in a given region involved in grain farming

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago