Answer:
b. rise, so demand in the market for foreign-currency exchange shifts right.
Explanation:
- An increase in the interest rates leads to a rise in the capital outflow as savings and investment lead to more net capital outflow.
- This is the movement of the assets on the company and is considered to be bad for the economy and leads to undesirable changes in the supply of the foreign currency as a shift in the demands of the consumers. This may result in political and economic instability.
Answer:
33,610.42 units
Explanation:
For computing the minimum annual production rate first we have to determine the annual worth by using the PMT formula which is shown below:
Given that
Present value = $258,388
Interest rate = 10%
NPER = 7 years
Future value = $0
The formula is shown below:
= PMT(RATER;NPER;-PV;FV;type)
The present values comes in a negative
After solving this, the annual worth is $53,074.32
And, the annual operating maintenance cost is $28,599
So, the revenue should be
= $53,074.32 + $28,599
= $81,673.32
Now the minimum annual production rate is
= $81,673.32 ÷ $2.43
= 33,610.42 units
It should be noted that the generic action option that serves as outgrowth of affirmative action programs is include/exclude action.
This generic action option gives attempts in increasing or decreasing the number of diverse people throughout an organization .
<h3>What is generic action option?</h3>
generic action can be regarded as an action which serves as generic delegate that is present in System namespace.
Learn more about generic action option at:
brainly.com/question/12851463
Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
