Standers ..................
The correct answers are:
1)In this passage the authorship point of view allows the narrator to A)tells a story more objectively.
2)The effect of telling the sory from a third person limited point of view is B) The reader can experience everythin Levi thought and felt.
3) The point of view in the story would be accurately described as B)Third person limited.
The second question already states that the narrator is telling the story from a third person limited point of view. This kind of narrative voice only knows what one character felt or thought, and the story is strongly focused on him, but we also see what surrounds him. This is different from a third person omniscient, that would be a god-like figure who could switch focus from one character to another, knowing what everyone felt or did.
This point of view allows to tell a story more objectively since we do not receive the information directly from the character and his limited views like a first person narrator would. We know what the main character is doing and thinking without the obvservations or the subjective perspectives of the characters. We are "watching" the plot from outside the frame.
Answer:
He did not want his friend to get in jail.
Explanation: If he did not call the cops than that means that: one, he did not want his friend to go to jail. Two, He wanted to help him. Three, he wanted to get half of what he probably stole. Hope this helps!
I believe the answer is A, as objectively possible.
