I would probably be calm and coaperative with them. I would do this because the more nervous and unsure you act, the more defencive they will most likely be.
I hope this helps :)
Answer:
x-axis: Amount of candy sold
y- axis: Amount of money made
Billy is making $0.20 per candy bar.
Linear function: y=3/5x-6
Billy sold 50 candy bars if he made $24.
The x-intercept represents the point when he will earn a profit because at point (5,-3) he sold 5 candy bars but he still made a loss of $3.
The exercise is related to the Ratio Test for Convergence. The rules for this kind of test are given below.
<h3>What are the rules for Ratio Test for Convergence?</h3>
The rules are:
- If the limit is less than 1 when conducting the ratio test, your series is definitely convergent.
- The test is inconclusive if the limit is equal to 1.
- The series is divergent if the limit is greater than 1.
Using this knowledge, we are able to state that
- A is not conclusive.
- C's convergence is absolute.
- There is divergence with D and E.
- B and F appear to be employing the nth-term test. The nth-term involves determining the sequence's limit as it approaches infinity.
The nth-term test determines whether a series is divergent if the limit is bigger than 0, thus, both B and F are divergent series.
Please see the attached for the full question and the link below for more about Ratio Test for Convergence:
brainly.com/question/16618162
Option A is wrong because,
only when p(5)=0 , x-5 can be a factor of p(x)
but the question says P(3)=-2
option B is wrong because,
only when p(2)=0 , x-2 can be a factor of p(x)
but the question says P(3)=-2
option C is wrong because,
only when p(-2)=0 , x+2 can be a factor of p(x)
but the question says P(3)=-2
option D is correct because,
only when p(3)=0 , x-3 can be a factor of p(x)
here p(x) is not equal to 0
therefore, p(x)=0+(-2)=-2
so when p(x) is divided by x-3 it will leave a reminder -2
hope it helps!!
